User:Alexandralopez324/sandbox

Article Evaluation
The facts in the rational-legal authority article do not have reliable and appropriate reference. I find that mostly everything that is in the article correlates with the topic. Some facts seem not to go along with the article but if you continue to read the article comes together. i believe that the article is very neutral, I believe that the article is not biased and is based on rational legal authority as a whole. The information is coming from two places a lecture and an article in the encyclopedia based on rational legal authority. I believed that these sources are fairly neutral, with the sole purpose to inform on Rational-legal authority. There aren't many citations, there are only two. Most of the information if not all comes from these two citations. The links to these to two citations to work. The information is not out of date but there should be more information on how rational legal authority works.

Annotated Bibliography
Coleman, J. (n.d.). Authority, Power, Leadership: Sociological Understandings. Retrieved 	October 20, 2016, from 	http://newtheologyreview.com/index.php/ntr/article/viewFile/563/746 Coleman’s article begins with a statement that declares that in a sociological view authority does not have one sole meaning and there is no “consensus” to it. Coleman then goes into how authority is defined. He gives a definition through how Max Weber defined authority. Coleman gives a brief definition of the difference between power and authority. Coleman gives an insight to how much and how authority is used. Coleman explains that authority runs any part of our lives. He then gives a definition to Max Weber’s three types of authority. This article would be helpful in our project because it is the information we are looking for to add to the Wikipedia page. It gives an insight to the way authority works and how it goes through our daily lives, which would help in giving examples to support our research.

Mtetesha, N. (n.d.). Authority, Power and Legitimacy. Retrieved October, 26, 2016. http://www.academia.edu/3482786/Authority_Power_and_Legitimacy

This article begins with an introduction to the meaning of what authority is and Max Weber’s three types of authority, traditional, charismatic, and rational legal authority. He explains why he believes that rational legal authority is the best of the three types of authority and he then explains the reason of his belief. Mtetesha then gives a definition of key concepts like power and the meaning of rational. He concludes by reinstating his idea that rational legal authority because of its rationality and structure. I believe this would help in our research into the project because it would give us an insight into why rational legal authority works better than the other two types of authority. It will help us establish a connection into seeing how rational legal authority works and proceeds to be the most rational of all three types of legitimacy that Max Weber establishes.

Naseer, A. (2014., November 30) Max Weber's concept of Rational-Legal Authority and its ... Retrieved October 20, 2016, from 	http://www.academia.edu/10733939/Max_Webers_concept_of_Rational-Legal_Authority_and_its_importance_for_modern_day_mass_democracy

Naseer begins the research by introducing Max Weber and hos work. The article continues to explain the three types of authority. Then the research proceeds to give a description on how rational legal authority is used in most modern governments and how it is used. I believe that this would a very helpful resource for our research because it will give an insight to how bureaucratization is lead by rational legal authority. This will give us an easier understanding on how rational legal authority functions in our government and how it works in most modern governments. This resource will help us in our research because it will give us a better understanding of rational legal authority and how it compares the traditional and charismatic authority. It will help us understand the differences and the works of rational authority.

Sociology.org.uk-Sociology Central. (n.d.). Retrieved October 20, 2016, from http://www.sociology.org.uk/wspmain.htm?wspo3.htm

This article is a form of chart that gives definitions to four terms coercion, charismatic, traditional, and rational legal authority. The article gives a definition of what rational legal authority is, this will help us have a better understanding of rational legal authority is and how it works in our society. This article also gives some examples on rational legal authority. This article will be a good resource because it will give an understanding by the examples that it has displayed. It will help us have an understanding of the other types of authority as well. Knowing the differences will help give a better understanding of rational legal authority.

Smith, R.W. (n.d.). The Concept of Legitimacy. Retrieved October 20,2016 from 	https://www.jstor.org/stable/41801858?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

In this article, Smith gives an explanation of Max Weber’s types of authority and then he describes the criticisms displayed by other authors. He gives a clear definition of rational authority and how it works in the western part of the world. He explains that this form of authority deals is mainly bureaucratic. He does explain some of the consequences of rational legal authority. This will help us understand that rational legal authority does have flaws and help us understand that this type of authority is not perfect. This article will help in being a resource that provides us with helpful information.