User:Alexandriahong/Hexakis(trimethylphosphine)tungsten/Lipidmonolayer1 Peer Review

General info
Alexandriahong
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:N/A
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Hexakis(trimethylphosphine)tungsten

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The introduction explains the complex but doesn't set up the structure of the article. I think it would be best to move the paragraph at the start of Reactivity to the introduction. With this change, I think that the introduction would provide a great, succinct explanation of the chemistry your compound does as well as why it's such a useful retron.

As for content, it's nice that there's a source from 2017. I wonder if there are any other articles from more recent years, but it seems to me from my reading that the Parkin group seemed to focus more on the molybdenum analogue after the turn of the millennium.

The delivery of the article seems to be neutral and does not favor any one group. I like that there are works from multiple research groups represented on the page.

The images on the page do a good job in breaking up chunks of text. They're also clear and concise. As for the structure, I appreciate that the reactions were grouped. However, I was wondering if you were planning to discuss the C-H activation studies since it was mentioned in the first paragraph under reactions.

For clarity, I think the unit eu should either be linked to the page for entropy units or its equivalency to 1 cal/K/mol should be specified as it's a non-standard unit.

Some small typos: "stable and solution" under Stability, missing subscripts for "W(PMe3)6" under Reactivity