User:Alexcrocker12345/Conservation biology/1947143432C Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Alexcrocker12345


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User talk:Alexcrocker12345/Conservation biology
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Conservation biology

Evaluate the drafted changes
In the "Context and trends" section, several of the existing subsections could be updated. For example, the "status of oceans and reefs" section outlines the current status of ocean conservation with sources that date to the year 2000 of before. I would find more current information to give readers a better understanding of the current status of those environments. Additionally, the "Context and trends" section could use more data visuals to give the readers a better grasp of conservation trends like extinction rate and population sizes over time. Grammar and wording could be improved. For example, the first sentence in the "Groups other than vertebrates" section is a sentence fragment. Furthermore, I would avoid descriptive wording such as "mysterious" or "puzzling". Reducing the descriptive language will help to present the facts in from a neutral point of view. In terms of balanced coverage, I feel the article does a good job of that, particularly in the "Concepts and foundations" section. 1947143432C (talk) 04:25, 20 February 2023 (UTC)