User:Alexcrocker12345/Conservation biology/Hbrowny5 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

alexcrocker12354


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * conservation biology
 * conservation biology

Evaluate the drafted changes
I don't think I saw anything in the sandbox. As for the article itself, it has a lot of good information in it. The lead section is concise, but I think it could be added to in order to reflect the contents of the rest of the article. I noticed that the first sentence in the origins section is a long run-on sentence, and could probably be broken up into two or more sentences. I also think that the references could be updated, and in turn the content could be updated to reflect the updated references.