User:Alexgoriani/Susan Schneider/UndoingMold6229 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
The text was deeply precise and descriptive. While reading the article I have noticed that theres no concrete exemples of the experiments she’s done. Adding exemples would make the text flow easier. I have also noticed that one of the references is badly formatted which might be due to an error. The overall structure of the article was well made with a lot of references to other topics. The article should be more balanced with the description because the AI section was the most detailed section whilst Susan’s bibliography and her education were the least detailed.