User:Alexisbums/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because, knowing a brief overview of her life through class lectures, I am able to analyze the language and the content in a more analytical way. I have a personal interest in performance art and canadian history, E Pauline Johnson bridges those gaps and plays an important role in the critical view of women in her time across racial and cultural boundaries. First Impression is that the article is quite substantial and detailed. I am happy that there is a section for her reception and legacy beyond her own work. E Pauline Johnson is not onlly an important female figure but also an important figure to the indigenous stories of canada.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The Introduction line is clear and concise, which not only says who she is and what she does but also why she is important. The sections move in a linear and easy to read fashion and speak to each part of her life and how it formed her persona. There are no spelling or grammatical errors to which I can see and it is not overzealous with hyperlinks or quotations. All pictures used are able to frame her in the way she wanted to be framed, with inclusion of both white and indigenous cultural dress represented. This articles strengths lie in its ability for depth without intertwining bias, opinion or unnecessary information.