User:Alexisderosa1/sandbox

Article evaluation
The way they say things and explain things is kind of confusing. The words and terms they use could be defined even if its a brief one just so it is less confusing. Everything is relevant to the topic and seems to be up to date. I like that they put future readings to read if you still need more information on this topic. In the external links they separated them into categories like the fields whats related and whats applied to the topic. I believe this article is neutral and is just giving information about the topic. The sources seem to work when I pressed on them. The sources seem to be neutral and they seem to be reliable sources.