User:Alexkaang/Evaluate an Article

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

I think everything in the article was relevant to the topic. My topic was on the USS Nantucket, a ship that was commissioned as a gunboat for the US Navy but eventually turned into a training ship for the Massachusetts Maritime Academy. Not much was distracting but the ongoing "Service History" section was a little tedious.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? What else could be improved?

No information is out of date, as it shows what the ship is now currently being used for, and its current state. I don't think there is much missing except that the article can add some information on the capabilities and technology on the ship. Some other things that can be improved is the writing style and have the page be a little bit more engaging so that it is easier to read.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

The article is neutral and keeps everything based off of facts to my understanding. I checked some references listed and they were strong references when taking into account the Wikipedia training modules and their recommendations on this as well.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

The viewpoint that focuses on the service history of the USS Nantucket seems to be of the utmost importance to the author of this article.

Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?

Two of the links do not work but the other sources do match up with the information given in the article. The source does support the claims in the article.

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

Yes, each fact is referenced with an appropriate reference. The information mostly comes from a navy sourced website about the history of their ships and its timelines. These seem to be neutral sources.

What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?

No conversations on the "Talk" page.

How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?

The article is a part of a couple WikiProjects related to ship history and Cape Cod history.