User:Alexsautographs/DiscussionMoved

Copyright problems with Image:HighSchool.gif
An image that you uploaded, Image:HighSchool.gif, has been listed at Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Oden 00:07, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Joel Downs, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. MECU ≈ talk 02:17, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:JoelDowns.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:JoelDowns.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 03:09, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

John Keefe
A tag has been placed on John Keefe, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Patricknoddy 22:19, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:PueblaParrots.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:PueblaParrots.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Cesar Bernhardt
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Cesar Bernhardt, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Cesar Bernhardt seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Cesar Bernhardt, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Cesar Bernhardt itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 05:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Wilmy Caceres
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Wilmy Caceres, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Wilmy Caceres seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Wilmy Caceres, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Wilmy Caceres itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 05:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Lorenzo Buelna
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Lorenzo Buelna, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Lorenzo Buelna seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Lorenzo Buelna, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Lorenzo Buelna itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 05:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Al Curtis
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Al Curtis, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Al Curtis seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Al Curtis, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Al Curtis itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 05:48, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Don Johnson (baseball)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Don Johnson (baseball), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Don Johnson (baseball) seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Don Johnson (baseball), please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Don Johnson (baseball) itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 07:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Lorenzo Buelna
Lorenzo Buelna has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this person might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Notability (people) for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" template, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but if an editor is still not satisfied that it meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. NickelShoe (Talk) 01:30, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Jared-Abruzzo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Jared-Abruzzo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:28, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:WaterlooDiamonds.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:WaterlooDiamonds.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:37, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:CB-BD-AM-AS.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:CB-BD-AM-AS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:34, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Cade-Gaspar.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Cade-Gaspar.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 16:15, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:The Baseball Cube
Template:The Baseball Cube has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Caknuck 06:59, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Raul-Casanova.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Raul-Casanova.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B 01:43, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Will-Cunnane.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Will-Cunnane.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B 01:43, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:FayettevilleGenerals.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:FayettevilleGenerals.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:04, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Pinecrest Cemetery
A Proposed Deletion template has been added to the article Pinecrest Cemetery, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add db-author to the top of the page. Karanacs 20:28, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

No content in Category:Albany Twilight League
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Albany Twilight League, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Albany Twilight League has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Albany Twilight League, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 17:30, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Matt Brunson
Another editor has added the  template to the article Matt Brunson, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 22:00, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Matt-Brunson.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Matt-Brunson.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 18:27, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Soft 'N' Cuddly Men
A tag has been placed on Soft 'N' Cuddly Men requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Michael WhiteT·C 21:55, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Juan López (baseball)
A tag has been placed on Juan López (baseball), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. PMDrive1061 (talk) 21:35, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Daylan Holt
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Daylan Holt, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?  brew crewer  (yada, yada) 17:57, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pfeiffer Cemetery
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Pfeiffer Cemetery, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. DarkAudit (talk) 18:24, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Dean-Hartgraves.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Dean-Hartgraves.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Wizardman 20:01, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Larry-Brown.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Larry-Brown.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:25, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Patrick Stewart (author)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Patrick Stewart (author), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * This is an poorly referenced biography of a living person that does not convincingly assert nor verify the notability of its subject

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Skomorokh 19:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Patrick Stewart (author)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Patrick Stewart (author), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * No indication of meeting WP:BIO.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  Sandstein  19:39, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Brant-Brown.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Brant-Brown.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Wizardman 23:46, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Maple Grove Cemetery
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Maple Grove Cemetery, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Cemetery with no assertion of notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 15:28, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Deletion review for Surnames by Country
The discussion for Categories for discussion/Log/2009 June 6 in which you participated was closed as delete and is now under review at Deletion review/Log/2009 June 25. Your participation and input is invited. Alansohn (talk) 05:32, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of One World Insight
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article One World Insight, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability, no external links found.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ApprenticeFan talk  contribs 14:25, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Newark Co-Pilots
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Newark Co-Pilots, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * I can't find any reliable sources that show notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Iowateen (talk) 05:20, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Kal-Daniels.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kal-Daniels.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 17:15, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Richmond Colts
I have nominated Richmond Colts, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Richmond Colts. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. User:Nezzadar (speak) 01:53, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Connie Fields
I have nominated Connie Fields, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Connie Fields. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Cynof G  avuf 00:31, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:AngelopolisTigres.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:AngelopolisTigres.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Proposed deletion of Pfeiffer Cemetery
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Pfeiffer Cemetery, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. DarkAudit (talk) 18:24, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Gifford, Pennsylvania
A tag has been placed on Gifford, Pennsylvania requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Shicoco (talk) 05:23, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Kal Daniels and removing tags
I just noticed your edits of October 15th to Kal Daniels, notably this one, where you removed two who tags without providing references to eliminate the weasel words. Please do not remove tags such as who or unreferenced (which you also removed after providing only one reference, to a stats page) unless you have thoroughly resolved the problem identified by the tags. Thanks. Mr. Darcy talk 02:23, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Patrick Stewart (author)
I have nominated Patrick Stewart (author), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Patrick Stewart (author). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.  Sandstein  20:43, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Notability of V.I.E.W.
A tag has been placed on V.I.E.W. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Finngall  talk  22:01, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Tex-Clevenger.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tex-Clevenger.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 16:31, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Chad-Green.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Chad-Green.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:03, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Connie Fields
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Connie Fields. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Connie Fields. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Oak Hill Cemetery (Palatka, Florida)
I have nominated Oak Hill Cemetery (Palatka, Florida), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Oak Hill Cemetery (Palatka, Florida). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jrtayloriv (talk) 23:53, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Jose Lugo
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Jose Lugo. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Jose Lugo. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:15, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Sergio Contreras
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Sergio Contreras. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Sergio Contreras. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:15, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Nice to see someone else working on obscure ballplayers. Keep up the good work! -Colin Kimbrell 16:24, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Baseball pages
Thanks for your support Alex. Cheeers – MusiCitizen 12:41, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

In general baseball cards do not fall under fair use because the copyright is still held by Topps, Fleer, Upper Deck, etc. Posting images of their cards would probably be considered to be in violation of their copyright. Older baseball card from the 1800's early part of the 20th century can sometimes be used as the images have fallen into the public domain because of their age. This is my best understanding of the issue. Also check out this link. No Guru 23:17, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Please remember to use edit summaries. You can see how often you use them here: http://www.math.ucla.edu/~aoleg/wp/rfa/edit_summary.html Happy editing! ςפקι Д Иτς ☺ ☻ 04:23, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Re: Your question about Topps Cards
I'm not sure there is a tag that covers this situation. For now you should copy and paste the email from Topps into each image description. I also encourage you to raise the topic here - you might get some better, more specific advice. Happy editing. No Guru 02:14, 25 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The Topps permission is useless to us, because it applies only to Wikipedia, not to any downstream users, or even other Wikimedia projects, such as Wikinews or Wikibooks. That's why we want real licenses like GFDL or CC, not vague permissions. Stan 04:58, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Topps baseball cards images
Hi. I don't believe that this letter provides adequate justification for use of the images of Topps baseball cards on Wikipedia. Though I'm unsure what your original query to the Topps legal staff was, I can only assume that it was not adequetly explained that Wikipedia is licensed under the GFDL and thus cannot use works or images that are not released under a compatible free license, aside from the rare items that can be used under the fair use doctrine of US law. Please retag these images properly in accordance with Image copyright tags and Image use policy, or they will have to be deleted. Thank you.--Sean Black (talk) 05:43, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Oh Well
Then I guess they gotta be deleted. All I was trying to do was to get examples of these players cards on this site and this is what Topps gave me.Alex 15:08, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

baseball player articles
Hey - nice work on all the baseball player articles. One suggestion - could you include an external links or better yet a references section when you create these articles? It's helpful to know where the information is coming from. Thanks, Mattingly23 21:38, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

There's a need for a fix in the Greg Keagle article. It says he pitched the first no-hitter in Elmira Pioneers history, but there was actually 3 no-hitters pitched by the Pioneers in 1965. There's more about this in the Greg Keagle talk page.--Ando por Fe 17:26, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Major League - Uni lists.
I've moved some of the pages you've created that had "Major Leaguers" to "Major League Baseball players who played for University", capitalising Major League Baseball, and the university name as appropriate. Just something to note on the naming if you plan to make a new list in the future. --Borgarde 10:02, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Proposition
Hi! I am AlexHillan, member of the Department of Fun and creator of Wikipedia the Beautiful. I noticed that you are a composer of one or more wikisongs. I am proposing that Wikipedia the Beautiful becomes the official theme song. You may leave me a message on my talk page telling me what you think. Thanks, AlexHillan 19:00, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:AngelopolisTigres.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:AngelopolisTigres.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Thanks
Hi Alexautographs! I just wanted to thank you for creating articles for first-round Minnesota draft picks that still needed them. It looks great now. Thanks again. RyguyMN 07:26, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Peer review/Raul Casanova
I left you a comment. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 02:30, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

List of Major League Baseball players: Z
Forgot about finishing that up. I'll take care of it shortly. Wizardman 02:22, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Inconsistency between Alex Main and Evergreen Cemetery (Tannersville, New York)‎
Hi Alexsautographs, I noticed there is an inconsistency in the above articles that you created regarding Alex Main's burial location. Do you have access to a reference that could clear up this inconsistency? Regards, Accurizer (talk) 23:46, 6 July 2008 (UTC)


 * No problem; glad to help. Regards, Accurizer (talk) 23:52, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Song
Hallo, I am from the german Wikipedia from the sociologic section, and I found out that you wrote a song text on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Song. We want to know the reason(s) why you wrote this song. It would be kind of you to leave an english (or german) comment on http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedistik/Soziologie/Musik&action=edit&redlink=1. Thank you --84.166.123.219 (talk) 07:29, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pfeiffer Cemetery
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Pfeiffer Cemetery, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. DarkAudit (talk) 18:24, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Gifford, Pennsylvania
A tag has been placed on Gifford, Pennsylvania requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Shicoco (talk) 05:23, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Kal Daniels and removing tags
I just noticed your edits of October 15th to Kal Daniels, notably this one, where you removed two who tags without providing references to eliminate the weasel words. Please do not remove tags such as who or unreferenced (which you also removed after providing only one reference, to a stats page) unless you have thoroughly resolved the problem identified by the tags. Thanks. Mr. Darcy talk 02:23, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Patrick Stewart (author)
I have nominated Patrick Stewart (author), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Patrick Stewart (author). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.  Sandstein  20:43, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Notability of V.I.E.W.
A tag has been placed on V.I.E.W. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Finngall  talk  22:01, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Tex-Clevenger.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tex-Clevenger.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 16:31, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Chad-Green.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Chad-Green.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:03, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Template:Infobox MLB retired
Please do not use this template on any newly-created pages. The template has been deleted and replaced with a redirect to Template:Infobox MLB player, which is now being used for all MLB players, past and present. Thanks! -Dewelar (talk) 05:20, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Toledo Iron Men
A tag has been placed on Toledo Iron Men requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Alastair Rae (talk) 11:48, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

J. C. Ramírez
Good work with the J. C. Ramírez article. Just remember to use the proper last name (example: Ramírez not Ramirez). Also use the Template:Infobox MLB player even on MiLB players. Keep up the good work. --Brian Halvorsen (talk) 03:58, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Pete Adams (baseball)
I have nominated Pete Adams (baseball), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Pete Adams (baseball). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Wizardman 21:55, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Tom-Dunbar.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Tom-Dunbar.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Wizardman 18:41, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Baseball AfDs
I notice you've recently nominated quite a few articles at WP:AFD. I'd like to suggest a couple of other alternative ways to go about deletion for articles that are not likely to be controversial. First, if you are the creator and only editor of an article, it is possible to tag the article for speedy deletion using the db-author template. Alternatively, if other editors have edited the article or you'd like to give other editors a chance to halt the deletion, you can tag it for proposed deletion. That gives anyone else who may be interested in keeping the article a week to remove the deletion tag, but avoids going through the AFD discussion process. These processes may be useful for nominations that are not likely to be controversial. BRMo (talk) 16:24, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Grady White


The article Grady White has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable minor leaguer, fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Glenfarclas (talk) 02:36, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Why all the afds?
Really Alex.. knock it off already... Why have you gotten all deletionist all of a sudden?Spanneraol (talk) 03:57, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Francisco Butto AfD
I noticed that you added an AfD tag to Francisco Butto, but you didn't complete the nomination by creating a discussion page and adding it to the AfD log. (The AfD tag points to a previous AfD discussion on this article, which resulted in a decision to "keep" it.) If you would like to proceed with a second nomination, please complete the process, otherwise please remove the AfD tag. Thanks. BRMo (talk) 05:11, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Alexsautographs! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 19 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:


 * 1) Mario Ramos -
 * 2) Earl Smith (1950s outfielder) -
 * 3) Trey Lunsford -
 * 4) Tom Dunbar -
 * 5) Shawn Hillegas -
 * 6) Luis Raven -
 * 7) Chris Petersen (baseball) -
 * 8) Jack Heidemann -
 * 9) Santiago Pérez (baseball) -
 * 10) Chad Green -

11. Mark Johnson (catcher) 12. Richie Lewis 13. Bryan Clark (baseball) 14. Jack McMahan 15. Phil Hennigan 16. Ted Ford 17. Tom Carroll (infielder) 18. Ron Nischwitz 19. Dan Smith (minor league pitcher)

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:09, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Nonsense categories
Please don't create nonsense categories. I have just deleted Category:Torsoless athletes, which you created at 11:08, 13 January 2010. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 03:04, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Non-free use of Baseball Cards
Hi, Alexsautographs. I can appreciate your work on improving the baseball player articles -- unfortunately however, an image of a coprighted baseball card as a picture for a player's article does not meet Wikipedia's fair-use criteria. (See #7 of unacceptable uses. Baseball cards may meet fair use for a BLP only when the card itself is discussed in the article for something notable, as for example Cal Ripken). Therefore, the following files which you uploaded should be tagged for speedy deletion: If you have reason to believe that these files meet fair use inclusion for other reasons, please add the Your reason why a free replacement can not be found or created to the file. On the other hand, if you know of other files which you have uploaded that will also fail Fair Use policy, please tag them for deletion. Regards. — Cactus Writer |   needles  11:46, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Randy-Asadoor.jpg
 * File:Larry-Barnes.jpg
 * File:Sean-Bergman.jpg
 * File:Rich-Bordi.jpg
 * File:Warren-Brusstar.jpg
 * File:Brian-Dayett.jpg
 * File:Sergio-Contreras.jpg
 * File:Jim-Farr.jpg
 * File:Ray-Fontenot.jpg
 * File:Milt-Graff.jpg
 * File:Steve-Hosey.jpg
 * File:Johnny-James.jpg
 * File:Larry-Jaster.jpg
 * Thanks for your quick response. And no problem -- I understand that these were uploaded back when you were just learning the ropes. This kind of fair use error is common. There is a big learning curve for all the rules and regs. I have marked the above for deletion. But it would be very helpful if you could review the other files that you have uploaded during the years and check them for proper use. Cheers. — Cactus Writer |   needles  09:52, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

RfA
I don't want you to come away thinking that the main reason your RfA is failing right now is because you only waited half a day from the last one; and I think it's unfortunate that that is the first thing the opposers are bringing up. If you have set adminship as a goal, it might be a good idea to try an editor review or even a less formal process of seeking outside opinions on what you could do to improve your editing habits. As for myself, I havent really looked at your edits in detail, though this talk page seems to indicate that you've created quite a few things that were quickly deleted. -- Soap Talk/Contributions 20:26, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Your second RFA
I've closed it, as it had no chance and was a disruption, wethe ror not to prove a WP:POINT I don't know but either way it was. Please, read WP:NOTNOW and the associated links - and don't even think about running for several months - honestly you won't pass with your current attitude. Sorry. Pedro : Chat  22:17, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * You will not, I repeat not stand a chance so soon. Whilst it may not be trolling it does look pointy. Even if this is not true I can assure you that you will need several months of clear editing before getting the bit (and I might add it's not that great when you do). At the point of closure you would have needed some 40 - 50 supports with no further opposes which was unrealistic in the extreme. I'm sorry but honestly I'd ignore RFA for some time is my best advice. If you want you could allways go to WP:BN but I'd be suprised if any bureaucrat would recommend reopening your RFA Pedro : Chat  22:29, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your reply. I'm not trying to be harsh here, but I've been knocking around WP for a while and seriously - two RFA's in as many days is not a good plan and really is poor form. Having said that, the last thing I want is to drive away a quality and driven editor, so please don't feel this is personal or vindicitive - it's just knocking through some red tape and trying to help everyone. Happy editing and if you need any assistance please feel free to hit me up. Pedro : Chat  22:35, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chad Green


The article Chad Green has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Is this notable?

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Scott Mac (Doc) 16:09, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Minor league team stubs
I see that you have sort of a passion for baseball, and have probably placed some good articles on Wikipedia. However, do you think your baseball stubs on Minor league teams are sufficiently notable for Wikipedia? I mean I really don't know. The problem as I see it is: if the individual organization has received no or very little notice, then it is not notable WP:ORG. Also, an organization or team is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in secondary sources. Such sources must be reliable, and independent of the subject. A single source is almost never sufficient for demonstrating the notability of an organization WP:ORG. I notice most all of your minor league stubs are based on one web site. Anyway, I guess I would like to discuss this matter. Steve Quinn (formerly Ti-30X) (talk) 04:33, 15 February 2010 (UTC)==February 2010== Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. --DAJF (talk) 01:40, 19 February 2010 (UTC)==Final discussion for Requests for comment/Biographies of living people ==Hello, I note that you have commented on the first phase of Requests for comment/Biographies of living peopleAs this RFC closes, there are two proposals being considered:# Proposal to Close This RfC#Alternate proposal to close this RFC: we don't need a whole new layer of bureaucracyYour opinion on this is welcome. Okip 02:07, 24 February 2010 (UTC)==Speedy deletion nomination of Kyle Skipworth== A tag has been placed on Kyle Skipworth requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. PhGustaf (talk) 23:39, 14 March 2010 (UTC)==Proposed deletion of Kyle Skipworth==The article Kyle Skipworth has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern::Not notable under WP:ATHWhile all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PhGustaf (talk) 23:59, 14 March 2010 (UTC)==Speedy deletion of Ballinger Cats==Hello Alexsautographs, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, Ballinger Cats, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:Mamyles. This has been done because the page seems to be about a person, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add " " to the page text, and edit the to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:Mamyles. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of 09:57, 24 April 2010 (UTC)== Autoreviewer ==Hi. I just patrolled Oscar Westerberg. Why don't you request Autoreviewer permission? It would avoid a few clicks for newpage patrollers. Best, Pichpich (talk) 02:23, 31 May 2010 (UTC)== Move of Dutch Wetzel ==That's fine if you think the original title is correct. I moved it because there was no indication in the article that the nickname was common. PrincessofLlyr royal court 19:03, 31 May 2010 (UTC)==Speedy deletion nomination of Charlie Wheatley==A tag has been placed on Charlie Wheatley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. BurtAlert (talk) 01:16, 4 June 2010 (UTC)== Larry Jaster article ==The miscellaneous section that I deleted contained information that was already in the article.Jaster threw five shutouts versus the Dodgers in 1966 That he gave up a Grand slam home run in the 1968 World Series That he started the first ever Montreal Expo home game As for the other informationThe height and weight of a player at the time he played isn't seen in the vast majority of wikipedia articles and I've edited over 1,000 of them that concern former MLB players and have created some from scratch. For instance Jim Duckworth. Jaster was a pitching coach. That could be put in the article's main section. In fact Jaster has been a minor league pitching coach or pitching coordinator in the Orioles or Braves organizations for over twp decade. His nickname is in dispute. I've found sources that Jaster's nickname was creeper not Dodger killer. The article has problems of its own. For instance, the writing is sloppy and can use editing to make it neater. Also opinions are given on his hitting, and ERA etc. This is an encyclopedia entry, not an editorial. Some of the opinions may be right, some may be wrong, but the tone of the article is supposed to be kept neutral.Facts are also either wrong or foggy. For instance-Jaster finished T4 in the 1966 ROY voting not 4th alone(Randy Hundley and Cleon Jones got the same points) Jaster did not call it quits at the end of the 1972 season. He spent parts of two more years pitching for the Richmond Braves, the AAA affiliate of Atlanta. The college he attended is referred to as Northwood University not Northwood Institute. Jaster made 8 errors in his career not seven. Here's some information that would improve the article-He had a son and brother who both played professional baseball. In a 1968 game against the NY Mets, Jaster came within 4 outs of a no-hitter perfect game. He retired the first 23 batters in a row.His Fielding percentage in 1969 was .684 due to his making 6 errors in 19 chances. Google has a news archive. I may be able to find other things about Jaster to include in the article with proper citations. Here's one article I foundhttp://news.google.com/newspapers?id=FIwxAAAAIBAJ&sjid=-KkFAAAAIBAJ&pg=4294,4276669&dq=larry+jaster&hl=enBottom line, the article needs a great deal of cleanup. You sound like a fan of Jaster's, nothing wrong with that but encyclopedia entries aren't fan articles. I'm willing to clean up the article, put in the info I mentioned above, fix facts, and do general cleanup work. Then you can read it, and give me input back. What do you say?William 15:48, 5 July 2010 (UTC)I finished working on Jaster's page. Go over and take a look at it when you have a chance.William 19:24, 5 July 2010 (UTC)== Reviewer ==Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Tiptoety talk 06:16, 12 July 2010 (UTC)==Suggestion==*Given your latest AfD history about articles you yourself created, as well as the comments you made on the respective AfD pages, I think you might want to consider WP:POINT. Erpert (let's talk about it) 08:06, 4 August 2010 (UTC)==File copyright problem with File:VDayBlizzard.JPG==Thank you for uploading File:VDayBlizzard.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:02, 4 August 2010 (UTC)== Articles ==Yeah, I'm half way down the "A" list. Thanks. Keep up the good work, as well. --Brian Halvorsen (talk) 21:06, 20 August 2010 (UTC)==DYK nomination of Bob Latshaw== Hello! Your submission of Bob Latshaw at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Ishtar456 (talk) 00:07, 26 August 2010 (UTC)==DYK for Bob Latshaw== -- Cirt (talk) 18:02, 4 September 2010 (UTC)== Josh Hamilton (baseball) GAN ==I reviewed the article and placed it's nomination on hold. You can read my review here. Also, when you nominate an article for GA in the future, you need to paste to the top of the nominated article's talk page. ~DC Let's Vent 16:55, 9 September 2010 (UTC):It failed since you didn't follow up on the problems I brought up during the review.  ~DC  We Can Work It Out 10:47, 17 September 2010 (UTC)== Baseball players from college list ==I have nominated three lists that you created for deletion at Articles for deletion/Major League Baseball players who played for Penn State. I feel that do not merit inclusion and should be deleted.  Grsz 11  23:02, 11 September 2010 (UTC)== Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Don't-give-a-fuckism (3rd nomination) ==Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Don't-give-a-fuckism (3rd nomination) Inviting you to comment. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 14:38, 25 September 2010 (UTC)==What does Sumita mean in Japanese?==Hello, Alex. As to your question on 19 June 2009, Sumita is made up of the kanji "住" and "田". The first, "sumi" means life, or to live. The second "ta" is the kanji for rice field. One could effectively translate "住田" as "To live (amongst) the rice fields." Hope this helps. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Markmark28 (talk • contribs) 01:10, 6 October 2010 (UTC) == Nomination of Alton Biggs for deletion == The article Alton Biggs is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alton Biggs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 17:02, 14 January 2011 (UTC)==Pennsylvania-West Virginia League==This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Pennsylvania-West Virginia League, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://bioproj.sabr.org/bioproj.cfm?a=v&amp;v=l&amp;bid=2113&amp;pid=12731.It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:38, 1 March 2011 (UTC)== AFD on Frank Radler ==I saw the AfD you created at Articles_for_deletion/Frank_Radler. As it looks like you are the sole contributor to Frank Radler, you can also consider doing a speedy deletion with Template:Db-g7 and save the admins the backlog in dealing with the AfD. For what its worth, I agree with deletion. —Bagumba (talk) 22:22, 29 March 2011 (UTC)==License tagging for File:Sama1.jpg==Thanks for uploading File:Sama1.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 30 March 2011 (UTC)==Speedy deletion nomination of Society for the Abolition of the Month of August==A tag has been placed on Society for the Abolition of the Month of August requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.If you can assert the notability of the subject, contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and give your reasons on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. --DAJF (talk) 23:15, 30 March 2011 (UTC)==Orphaned non-free image File:Sama1.jpg==  Thanks for uploading File:Sama1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:36, 28 April 2011 (UTC)==Articles for deletion/Homar Rojas==There's an ongoing discussion related to the notability of players from the Mexican League going on at Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports), as an outgrowth of the discussion at the linked AFD. As such, your input would be welcome. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 20:54, 12 May 2011 (UTC)== Notability of minor league players on 40 man roster ==Regarding your edit of Ehire Adrianza, WP:BASEBALL/N doesnt imply notability from being on 40-man roster. Is there something else in WP:NSPORTS that I'm missing? I seem to remember some AfDs where articles were merged to the team's minor league page because of this. —Bagumba (talk) 09:53, 25 May 2011 (UTC): I've added back the notability tag. For 40-man qualification, WP:BASEBALL/N would need to be updated and then a source that shows he is on the 40-man roster needs to be added to the article. Otherwise, WP:GNG needs to be met. Thanks. —Bagumba (talk) 15:36, 26 May 2011 (UTC)== Al Alburquerque ==Look, man, have you seen his slide-piece? That's nasty. Hitters don't know what to think. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.115.32.130 (talk) 03:12, 26 May 2011 (UTC) ==Bert Whaling==Thanks for the compliment on the Bert Whaling article but, I'm not sure if the subject is notable enough or whether the article is thorough enough to be nominated for GA status.Orsoni (talk) 08:06, 13 July 2011 (UTC)== Chester Bujaci ==Bujaci's grandson (granddaughter?) posted to talk:Fargo-Moorhead Twins asking why his name wasn't linked. I thought it was an oversight, and said so. If you disagree, please go to that page and explain. Thanks. DS (talk) 01:36, 16 July 2011 (UTC)== Nomination of Robert L. Tiemann for deletion == A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert L. Tiemann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Robert L. Tiemann until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Pburka (talk) 15:29, 16 July 2011 (UTC)== Articles for deletion/Jo Matumoto ==Many thanks for the withdrawal at Articles for deletion/Jo Matumoto. Not all noms have the frame of mind that allows them to take a second look, and reconsider their nomination. Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 16:57, 21 July 2011 (UTC)== Nomination of Miguel De Los Santos for deletion == A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miguel De Los Santos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Miguel De Los Santos until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bgwhite (talk) 08:00, 31 July 2011 (UTC)== Merge of Beau Mills ==Saw that you merged Beau Mills. I am of the opinion that there are enough sources to pass GNG and survive as a stand alone article. Please reconsider changing it back. Thanks. Kinston eagle (talk) 10:17, 25 August 2011 (UTC)== Nomination of Tim Lahey for deletion ==I revamped the Tim Lahey article, added a bunch of sources. Hopefully it should be ok to not be deleted. It would be a shame if none of the phantom ballplayers had an article so that people can see an example of the career of one of these mysterious disappearing athletes. Cheers. &mdash; KV5  •  Talk  • 01:51, 6 September 2011 (UTC)== Proposed deletion of Buck Elliott ==The article Buck Elliott has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern::'''Fails WP:BASEBALL/N "Minor league players, managers, coaches, executives, and umpires are not assumed to be inherently notable." Scouts are not inherently notable, either.'''While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Agent Vodello OK, Let's Party, Darling! 20:10, 4 October 2011 (UTC)== Proposed deletion of Ray Malgradi ==The article Ray Malgradi has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern::Fails WP:BASEBALL/N, nothing presented to satisfy WP:NWhile all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Agent Vodello OK, Let's Party, Darling! 20:10, 4 October 2011 (UTC)== Caution ==Commentary such as this is completely unacceptable. If you are not able to respond to an argument without personalizing the issue, you are best to not reply at all. Comment on their argument, not their person. Resolute 14:49, 5 October 2011 (UTC)== Proposed deletion of Red Snapp ==The article Red Snapp has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern::Fails WP:BASE/N, nothing presented to even suggest meeting WP:GNGWhile all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:50, 5 October 2011 (UTC)== Proposed deletion of Mike Verdi ==The article Mike Verdi has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern::Fails WP:BASE/N, nothing presented to even suggest meeting WP:GNGWhile all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:52, 5 October 2011 (UTC)== Proposed deletion of Jethro McIntyre ==The article Jethro McIntyre has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern::'''Fails WP:BASE/N, nothing presented to even suggest meeting WP:GNG. Do sources 1 and 2 even mention him at all?'''While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:54, 5 October 2011 (UTC)== Proposed deletion of Bill Robertson (baseball) ==The article Bill Robertson (baseball) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern::Fails WP:BASE/N, nothing presented to even suggest meeting WP:GNGWhile all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:54, 5 October 2011 (UTC)== Proposed deletion of Bob Wells (manager) ==The article Bob Wells (manager) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern::Fails WP:BASE/N, nothing presented to even suggest meeting WP:GNGWhile all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:59, 5 October 2011 (UTC)== Proposed deletion of Harold Funk ==The article Harold Funk has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern::Fails WP:BASE/N, nothing presented to even suggest meeting WP:GNGWhile all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:00, 5 October 2011 (UTC)== Proposed deletion of Marty Purtell ==The article Marty Purtell has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern::Fails WP:BASE/N, nothing presented to even suggest meeting WP:GNGWhile all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:01, 5 October 2011 (UTC)== Nomination of Runt Marr for deletion == A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Runt Marr is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Runt Marr  until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:04, 5 October 2011 (UTC)== Proposed deletion of Dad Risley ==The article Dad Risley has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern::Fails WP:BASE/N and WP:GNG, only coverage is WP:ROUTINEWhile all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:07, 5 October 2011 (UTC)== Proposed deletion of Richard Klaus ==The article Richard Klaus has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern::Fails WP:BASE/N and WP:GNGWhile all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:08, 5 October 2011 (UTC)== Proposed deletion of Harold Kollar ==The article Harold Kollar has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern::Fails WP:BASE/N and WP:GNGWhile all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:10, 5 October 2011 (UTC)== Proposed deletion of Harold García ==The article Harold García has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern::'''Has never played in the Major Leagues. Fails WP:BASEBALL/N'''While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 21:26, 5 October 2011 (UTC)== Nomination of Richard Klaus and Buck Elliott for deletion == A discussion is taking place as to whether the articles  Richard Klaus and Buck Elliott is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The articles will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Richard Klaus and Articles for deletion/Buck Elliott until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Agent Vodello OK, Let's Party, Darling! 03:17, 7 October 2011 (UTC)==Minor league team stubs==I see that you have sort of a passion for baseball, and have probably placed some good articles on Wikipedia. However, do you think your baseball stubs on Minor league teams are sufficiently notable for Wikipedia? I mean I really don't know. The problem as I see it is: if the individual organization has received no or very little notice, then it is not notable WP:ORG. Also, an organization or team is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in secondary sources. Such sources must be reliable, and independent of the subject. A single source is almost never sufficient for demonstrating the notability of an organization WP:ORG. I notice most all of your minor league stubs are based on one web site. Anyway, I guess I would like to discuss this matter. Steve Quinn (formerly Ti-30X) (talk) 04:33, 15 February 2010 (UTC)==February 2010== Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. --DAJF (talk) 01:40, 19 February 2010 (UTC)==Final discussion for Requests for comment/Biographies of living people ==Hello, I note that you have commented on the first phase of Requests for comment/Biographies of living peopleAs this RFC closes, there are two proposals being considered:# Proposal to Close This RfC#Alternate proposal to close this RFC: we don't need a whole new layer of bureaucracyYour opinion on this is welcome. Okip 02:07, 24 February 2010 (UTC)==Speedy deletion nomination of Kyle Skipworth== A tag has been placed on Kyle Skipworth requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. PhGustaf (talk) 23:39, 14 March 2010 (UTC)==Proposed deletion of Kyle Skipworth==The article Kyle Skipworth has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern::Not notable under WP:ATHWhile all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PhGustaf (talk) 23:59, 14 March 2010 (UTC)==Speedy deletion of Ballinger Cats==Hello Alexsautographs, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, Ballinger Cats, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:Mamyles. This has been done because the page seems to be about a person, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add " " to the page text, and edit the to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:Mamyles. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of 09:57, 24 April 2010 (UTC)== Autoreviewer ==Hi. I just patrolled Oscar Westerberg. Why don't you request Autoreviewer permission? It would avoid a few clicks for newpage patrollers. Best, Pichpich (talk) 02:23, 31 May 2010 (UTC)== Move of Dutch Wetzel ==That's fine if you think the original title is correct. I moved it because there was no indication in the article that the nickname was common. PrincessofLlyr royal court 19:03, 31 May 2010 (UTC)==Speedy deletion nomination of Charlie Wheatley==A tag has been placed on Charlie Wheatley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. BurtAlert (talk) 01:16, 4 June 2010 (UTC)== Larry Jaster article ==The miscellaneous section that I deleted contained information that was already in the article.Jaster threw five shutouts versus the Dodgers in 1966 That he gave up a Grand slam home run in the 1968 World Series That he started the first ever Montreal Expo home game As for the other informationThe height and weight of a player at the time he played isn't seen in the vast majority of wikipedia articles and I've edited over 1,000 of them that concern former MLB players and have created some from scratch. For instance Jim Duckworth. Jaster was a pitching coach. That could be put in the article's main section. In fact Jaster has been a minor league pitching coach or pitching coordinator in the Orioles or Braves organizations for over twp decade. His nickname is in dispute. I've found sources that Jaster's nickname was creeper not Dodger killer. The article has problems of its own. For instance, the writing is sloppy and can use editing to make it neater. Also opinions are given on his hitting, and ERA etc. This is an encyclopedia entry, not an editorial. Some of the opinions may be right, some may be wrong, but the tone of the article is supposed to be kept neutral.Facts are also either wrong or foggy. For instance-Jaster finished T4 in the 1966 ROY voting not 4th alone(Randy Hundley and Cleon Jones got the same points) Jaster did not call it quits at the end of the 1972 season. He spent parts of two more years pitching for the Richmond Braves, the AAA affiliate of Atlanta. The college he attended is referred to as Northwood University not Northwood Institute. Jaster made 8 errors in his career not seven. Here's some information that would improve the article-He had a son and brother who both played professional baseball. In a 1968 game against the NY Mets, Jaster came within 4 outs of a no-hitter perfect game. He retired the first 23 batters in a row.His Fielding percentage in 1969 was .684 due to his making 6 errors in 19 chances. Google has a news archive. I may be able to find other things about Jaster to include in the article with proper citations. Here's one article I foundhttp://news.google.com/newspapers?id=FIwxAAAAIBAJ&sjid=-KkFAAAAIBAJ&pg=4294,4276669&dq=larry+jaster&hl=enBottom line, the article needs a great deal of cleanup. You sound like a fan of Jaster's, nothing wrong with that but encyclopedia entries aren't fan articles. I'm willing to clean up the article, put in the info I mentioned above, fix facts, and do general cleanup work. Then you can read it, and give me input back. What do you say?William 15:48, 5 July 2010 (UTC)I finished working on Jaster's page. Go over and take a look at it when you have a chance.William 19:24, 5 July 2010 (UTC)== Reviewer ==Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Tiptoety talk 06:16, 12 July 2010 (UTC)==Suggestion==*Given your latest AfD history about articles you yourself created, as well as the comments you made on the respective AfD pages, I think you might want to consider WP:POINT. Erpert (let's talk about it) 08:06, 4 August 2010 (UTC)==File copyright problem with File:VDayBlizzard.JPG==Thank you for uploading File:VDayBlizzard.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:02, 4 August 2010 (UTC)== Articles ==Yeah, I'm half way down the "A" list. Thanks. Keep up the good work, as well. --Brian Halvorsen (talk) 21:06, 20 August 2010 (UTC)==DYK nomination of Bob Latshaw== Hello! Your submission of Bob Latshaw at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Ishtar456 (talk) 00:07, 26 August 2010 (UTC)==DYK for Bob Latshaw== -- Cirt (talk) 18:02, 4 September 2010 (UTC)== Josh Hamilton (baseball) GAN ==I reviewed the article and placed it's nomination on hold. You can read my review here. Also, when you nominate an article for GA in the future, you need to paste to the top of the nominated article's talk page. ~DC Let's Vent 16:55, 9 September 2010 (UTC):It failed since you didn't follow up on the problems I brought up during the review.  ~DC  We Can Work It Out 10:47, 17 September 2010 (UTC)== Baseball players from college list ==I have nominated three lists that you created for deletion at Articles for deletion/Major League Baseball players who played for Penn State. I feel that do not merit inclusion and should be deleted.  Grsz 11  23:02, 11 September 2010 (UTC)== Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Don't-give-a-fuckism (3rd nomination) ==Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Don't-give-a-fuckism (3rd nomination) Inviting you to comment. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 14:38, 25 September 2010 (UTC)==What does Sumita mean in Japanese?==Hello, Alex. As to your question on 19 June 2009, Sumita is made up of the kanji "住" and "田". The first, "sumi" means life, or to live. The second "ta" is the kanji for rice field. One could effectively translate "住田" as "To live (amongst) the rice fields." Hope this helps. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Markmark28 (talk • contribs) 01:10, 6 October 2010 (UTC) == Nomination of Alton Biggs for deletion == The article Alton Biggs is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alton Biggs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 17:02, 14 January 2011 (UTC)==Pennsylvania-West Virginia League==This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Pennsylvania-West Virginia League, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://bioproj.sabr.org/bioproj.cfm?a=v&amp;v=l&amp;bid=2113&amp;pid=12731.It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:38, 1 March 2011 (UTC)== AFD on Frank Radler ==I saw the AfD you created at Articles_for_deletion/Frank_Radler. As it looks like you are the sole contributor to Frank Radler, you can also consider doing a speedy deletion with Template:Db-g7 and save the admins the backlog in dealing with the AfD. For what its worth, I agree with deletion. —Bagumba (talk) 22:22, 29 March 2011 (UTC)==License tagging for File:Sama1.jpg==Thanks for uploading File:Sama1.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 30 March 2011 (UTC)==Speedy deletion nomination of Society for the Abolition of the Month of August==A tag has been placed on Society for the Abolition of the Month of August requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.If you can assert the notability of the subject, contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and give your reasons on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. --DAJF (talk) 23:15, 30 March 2011 (UTC)==Orphaned non-free image File:Sama1.jpg==  Thanks for uploading File:Sama1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:36, 28 April 2011 (UTC)==Articles for deletion/Homar Rojas==There's an ongoing discussion related to the notability of players from the Mexican League going on at Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports), as an outgrowth of the discussion at the linked AFD. As such, your input would be welcome. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 20:54, 12 May 2011 (UTC)== Notability of minor league players on 40 man roster ==Regarding your edit of Ehire Adrianza, WP:BASEBALL/N doesnt imply notability from being on 40-man roster. Is there something else in WP:NSPORTS that I'm missing? I seem to remember some AfDs where articles were merged to the team's minor league page because of this. —Bagumba (talk) 09:53, 25 May 2011 (UTC): I've added back the notability tag. For 40-man qualification, WP:BASEBALL/N would need to be updated and then a source that shows he is on the 40-man roster needs to be added to the article. Otherwise, WP:GNG needs to be met. Thanks. —Bagumba (talk) 15:36, 26 May 2011 (UTC)== Al Alburquerque ==Look, man, have you seen his slide-piece? That's nasty. Hitters don't know what to think. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.115.32.130 (talk) 03:12, 26 May 2011 (UTC) ==Bert Whaling==Thanks for the compliment on the Bert Whaling article but, I'm not sure if the subject is notable enough or whether the article is thorough enough to be nominated for GA status.Orsoni (talk) 08:06, 13 July 2011 (UTC)== Chester Bujaci ==Bujaci's grandson (granddaughter?) posted to talk:Fargo-Moorhead Twins asking why his name wasn't linked. I thought it was an oversight, and said so. If you disagree, please go to that page and explain. Thanks. DS (talk) 01:36, 16 July 2011 (UTC)== Nomination of Robert L. Tiemann for deletion == A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert L. Tiemann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Robert L. Tiemann until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Pburka (talk) 15:29, 16 July 2011 (UTC)== Articles for deletion/Jo Matumoto ==Many thanks for the withdrawal at Articles for deletion/Jo Matumoto. Not all noms have the frame of mind that allows them to take a second look, and reconsider their nomination. Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 16:57, 21 July 2011 (UTC)== Nomination of Miguel De Los Santos for deletion == A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miguel De Los Santos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Miguel De Los Santos until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bgwhite (talk) 08:00, 31 July 2011 (UTC)== Merge of Beau Mills ==Saw that you merged Beau Mills. I am of the opinion that there are enough sources to pass GNG and survive as a stand alone article. Please reconsider changing it back. Thanks. Kinston eagle (talk) 10:17, 25 August 2011 (UTC)== Nomination of Tim Lahey for deletion ==I revamped the Tim Lahey article, added a bunch of sources. Hopefully it should be ok to not be deleted. It would be a shame if none of the phantom ballplayers had an article so that people can see an example of the career of one of these mysterious disappearing athletes. Cheers. &mdash; KV5  •  Talk  • 01:51, 6 September 2011 (UTC)== Proposed deletion of Buck Elliott ==The article Buck Elliott has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern::'''Fails WP:BASEBALL/N "Minor league players, managers, coaches, executives, and umpires are not assumed to be inherently notable." Scouts are not inherently notable, either.'''While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Agent Vodello OK, Let's Party, Darling! 20:10, 4 October 2011 (UTC)== Proposed deletion of Ray Malgradi ==The article Ray Malgradi has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern::Fails WP:BASEBALL/N, nothing presented to satisfy WP:NWhile all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Agent Vodello OK, Let's Party, Darling! 20:10, 4 October 2011 (UTC)== Caution ==Commentary such as this is completely unacceptable. If you are not able to respond to an argument without personalizing the issue, you are best to not reply at all. Comment on their argument, not their person. Resolute 14:49, 5 October 2011 (UTC)== Proposed deletion of Red Snapp ==The article Red Snapp has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern::Fails WP:BASE/N, nothing presented to even suggest meeting WP:GNGWhile all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:50, 5 October 2011 (UTC)== Proposed deletion of Mike Verdi ==The article Mike Verdi has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern::Fails WP:BASE/N, nothing presented to even suggest meeting WP:GNGWhile all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:52, 5 October 2011 (UTC)== Proposed deletion of Jethro McIntyre ==The article Jethro McIntyre has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern::'''Fails WP:BASE/N, nothing presented to even suggest meeting WP:GNG. Do sources 1 and 2 even mention him at all?'''While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:54, 5 October 2011 (UTC)== Proposed deletion of Bill Robertson (baseball) ==The article Bill Robertson (baseball) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern::Fails WP:BASE/N, nothing presented to even suggest meeting WP:GNGWhile all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:54, 5 October 2011 (UTC)== Proposed deletion of Bob Wells (manager) ==The article Bob Wells (manager) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern::Fails WP:BASE/N, nothing presented to even suggest meeting WP:GNGWhile all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:59, 5 October 2011 (UTC)== Proposed deletion of Harold Funk ==The article Harold Funk has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern::Fails WP:BASE/N, nothing presented to even suggest meeting WP:GNGWhile all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:00, 5 October 2011 (UTC)== Proposed deletion of Marty Purtell ==The article Marty Purtell has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern::Fails WP:BASE/N, nothing presented to even suggest meeting WP:GNGWhile all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:01, 5 October 2011 (UTC)== Nomination of Runt Marr for deletion == A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Runt Marr is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Runt Marr  until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:04, 5 October 2011 (UTC)== Proposed deletion of Dad Risley ==The article Dad Risley has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern::Fails WP:BASE/N and WP:GNG, only coverage is WP:ROUTINEWhile all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:07, 5 October 2011 (UTC)== Proposed deletion of Richard Klaus ==The article Richard Klaus has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern::Fails WP:BASE/N and WP:GNGWhile all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:08, 5 October 2011 (UTC)== Proposed deletion of Harold Kollar ==The article Harold Kollar has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern::Fails WP:BASE/N and WP:GNGWhile all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:10, 5 October 2011 (UTC)== Proposed deletion of Harold García ==The article Harold García has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern::'''Has never played in the Major Leagues. Fails WP:BASEBALL/N'''While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 21:26, 5 October 2011 (UTC)== Nomination of Richard Klaus and Buck Elliott for deletion == A discussion is taking place as to whether the articles  Richard Klaus and Buck Elliott is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The articles will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Richard Klaus and Articles for deletion/Buck Elliott until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Agent Vodello OK, Let's Party, Darling! 03:17, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Click here to see all the non-interesting or old stuff.

Nomination of Jethro McIntyre for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jethro McIntyre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jethro McIntyre until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:54, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Harold Kollar for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harold Kollar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Harold Kollar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:00, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Mike Verdi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mike Verdi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mike Verdi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:02, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Ernie Jenkins (baseball) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ernie Jenkins (baseball) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ernie Jenkins (baseball) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:06, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of William Adams (baseball)


The article William Adams (baseball) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable baseball player, fails WP:GNG and WP:BASE/N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:52, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of William Adams (baseball) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Adams (baseball) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/William Adams (baseball) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:54, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Troy Agnew


The article Troy Agnew has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable baseball player, fails WP:GNG and WP:BASE/N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:55, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bruce Andrew (baseball)


The article Bruce Andrew (baseball) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable baseball player, fails WP:GNG and WP:BASE/N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:00, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

PRODs
I am absolutely in my right to reinsert a PROD on an article when the concern has not been addressed. I can't undo your edit now because of 3RR, which you violated by reinserting it that last time. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:29, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Prod rules: "If anyone, including the article creator, removes a {/{proposed deletion}/} tag from an article, do not replace it, even if the tag was apparently removed in bad faith."

It's tough for me being right all the time, but it's a cross I have to bear. Alex (talk) 20:30, 12 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Okay, that time I am wrong. That doesn't change the fact that your behavior is disruptive. That article will be deleted by AfD, and your conduct will be discussed at RfC. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:33, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

I have not done anything that is against the rules. It's just that I know how to stay calm while my fellow editors lack that skill. Alex (talk) 20:34, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Bruce Andrew (baseball) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bruce Andrew (baseball) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bruce Andrew (baseball) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:31, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Richard Klaus
You might have missed my comment at the Richard Klaus AfD, but can you explain the distinction between your !vote rational to keep one scout, Klaus, but delete another scout. Maybe I'm missing something and you can sway my !vote. Otherwise, there is a concern that your actions were done to make a point. Cheers.—Bagumba (talk) 23:36, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Notification of RfC
This is a courtesy notice to make you aware that a request for comment has been opened relating to your conduct relating to sourcing, creation and deletion of biographies, and Wikipedia's policies on biographies of living persons. You are invited to comment and respond at Requests for comment/Alexsautographs‎. Thank you. &mdash; KV5  •  Talk  •  01:21, 13 October 2011 (UTC)


 * In light of the aforementioned RfC, this comment is completely inappropriate. You are advised to respond appropriately at the RfC/U and directly address the specific concerns made by other editors regarding your conduct. As a courtesy, I can tell you that you are likely looking at further community sanctions if you continue to follow the same course you've been on and refuse to address those issues. &mdash; KV5  •  Talk  •  01:59, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

AGF
Hey there. Please assume good faith. Making jokes about a mistake doesn't make for a nice environment for collaboration. -- Gordonrox24 &#124; Talk 02:50, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Red Snapp for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Red Snapp is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Red Snapp until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:59, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wray Query


The article Wray Query has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable minor league baseball player and manager

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:43, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Harold Funk for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harold Funk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Harold Funk until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:46, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Joe Macko


The article Joe Macko has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable minor league figure

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:51, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pete Pavlick


The article Pete Pavlick has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable minor league figure

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:55, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Keith Frazier


The article Keith Frazier has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable minor league figure

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:58, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of James Groninger


The article James Groninger has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable minor league baseball figure

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:04, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cletus Dixon


The article Cletus Dixon has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable minor league baseball figure

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:05, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Woody Smith


The article Woody Smith has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable baseball figure

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:07, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dutch Dorman


The article Dutch Dorman has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable baseball figure

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:08, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Everett Robinson


The article Everett Robinson has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable baseball figure

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:09, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Earl Wolgamot


The article Earl Wolgamot has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable minor league figure

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:13, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Ken Staples for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ken Staples is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ken Staples (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:17, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Frank Leonard (baseball)


The article Frank Leonard (baseball) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable minor league figure

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:22, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Frank Leonard (baseball) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frank Leonard (baseball) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Frank Leonard (baseball) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:24, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Keith Frazier for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Keith Frazier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Keith Frazier until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:28, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Pete Pavlick for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pete Pavlick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pete Pavlick until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:30, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Cletus Dixon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cletus Dixon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cletus Dixon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:35, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Woody Smith for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Woody Smith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Woody Smith until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:35, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Dutch Dorman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dutch Dorman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dutch Dorman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:38, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Everett Robinson for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Everett Robinson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Everett Robinson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:40, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of James Groninger for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Groninger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/James Groninger until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:44, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

College baseball accomplishments
I ask that you stop prodding and merging baseball players who were nationally recognized as a college baseball player per WP:ATHLETE. I removed your prods at Jeff Corsaletti (all-American in 2005) and Michael Belfiore (baseball) (2009 second team selection).--TM 17:40, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Scott Campbell (baseball) AfD
Surely if you are putting an article up at AfD, you believe it should be deleted. Putting up an ambivalent nomination is (a) a waste of time, and (b) going to get other editors even more angry with you than they already are. I can see where this point and other similar ones have been made many times before but it apparently hasn't gotten through: stop making these nominations when you are wishy-washy on them yourself. If you truly question the validity of this (or any other) article - and I mean question it, rather than confidently believing it should not exist you are uncertain - then raise the issue at the article's talk page. If you're concerned that the talk page won't attract enough attention then go to the talk page of the WikiProject(s) the article belongs to.

In the case of Scott Campbell, you should already be aware of how an sports-related article can pass WP:GNG without passing WP:NSPORT, and that WP:NSPORT is only a guide as to the likelihood that it'll pass WP:GNG.  Afaber012  (talk) 23:42, 20 October 2011 (UTC)


 * When you continue to make comments like this, it really does not help your case when you have chosen to ignore, to date, the RfC/U regarding your conduct. Although an RfC cannot issue or enforce any sort of sanction, I am notifying you now that choosing to ignore the RfC and continuing disruptive action could lead to a block anyway. Disruptive editing is defined as "a pattern of edits, which may extend over a considerable period of time or number of articles, that has the effect of: disrupting progress toward improving an article; or, disrupting progress toward the fundamental project of building an encyclopedia". Your actions constitute this, and I am asking you to read the concerns raised at the RfC/U linked above on your talk page, and perhaps to formulate a response. If the RfC continues as it is currently headed, the next step will probably be something more formal that will involve sanctions. Alex, you are a good content editor and the Baseball WikiProject does not want to lose your contributions, but you must reconsider these editing habits if you want to continue your thus far productive career on this Wikipedia. &mdash; KV5  •  Talk  •  00:37, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The Scott Campbell is the only one to date I have been ambivalent on.


 * I was just joking about Camping. I was planning on withdrawing my nomination anyway. Alex (talk) 09:37, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Again, you don't get the point. You make throw away comments like that so often that others start to question how seriously you take anything on here. I realise that it's not a business, that we don't all rely on each other to work hard to get a paycheck at the end of the week, or anything of that nature, but people invest time and effort into this. And when you act so cavalierly about the whole thing as though none of it matters, that it continually seems as though because you hold an opinion that its right and everyone else is wrong, that your way of going on is best and anyone who disagrees doesn't know what they're talking about, it shouldn't then be a surprise that others get annoyed and angry with you. If you truly want to be a positive contributor, take notice of the comments that have been made about and to you, and show that you're trying to work with everyone else. Disagreements about how to handle situations are of course going to happen, but when they're handled maturely there's usually a positive outcome. The attitude and reputation that you're cultivating at the moment make it almost impossible for that to happen.  Afaber012  (talk) 10:35, 21 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Everything Afaber wrote above is absolutely true. This response, while technically "a response", did absolutely nothing to address the concerns raised by the certifiers and other editors who have raised concerns. While it is not required that you responded, it is considered good form to do so and in such a way that you directly address each concern that other editors raise about your conduct. Your attitude, described as "cavalier" above (that is absolutely the perfect word for it), is not helping your case. Completely refusing to acknowledge that you have done anything wrong, as per the permalink above, is simple proof that you truly either a) do not understand how deletion processes operate; or, b) that you do understand and are deliberately circumventing the normal progression. When you are "just joking" about something, that's all well and good, but there is a time and a place for humor. Making a snarky comment like that at an AfD, when you are fully aware and have been notified that there is an active RfC about your conduct regarding AfD, indicates to me that you don't care enough to make changes that will make this community activity better for everyone. Right now, your actions are not improving the community; they are hindering it. &mdash; KV5  •  Talk  •  11:14, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Survey for new page patrollers
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 10:58, 25 October 2011 (UTC).

Nomination of Wray Query for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wray Query is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Wray Query until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:33, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Joe Macko for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joe Macko is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Joe Macko until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:42, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pel Austin


The article Pel Austin has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:14, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Pel Austin
Hello, Alexsautographs, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Articles for deletion/Pel Austin whether the article Pel Austin should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Pel Austin, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! – Muboshgu (talk) 01:06, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Spencer Abbott


The article Spencer Abbott has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:09, 11 November 2011 (UTC)