User:Alexxx1/The 10 Random Pages Test

I ripped off this idea from Ambi.

So here are my 10 random pages:


 * 1) Nikolai Karlovich Medtner 8/10 - A 14-month old biographical article. Needs referencing - it's got nothing at the moment. The layout could be improved. Could do with another image or two. Otherwise, I would say it's getting close to feature article standard.
 * 2) Beatrix Farrand 7/10 - Another biography. Not bad, but given that it has been kicking around for over 3 years, should probably be even better. The text is in one big block. Needs organising, needs an image, needs referencing.
 * 3) CBHA-FM 5/10 - Just a stub that could use a little expanding. I've seen much worse.
 * 4) Waraich 3/10 - Another stub. Needs a lot of work and is hard to understand at present.
 * 5) Camp Couture 4/10 - Another stub. Not quite as confusing as the last one but not much information here.
 * 6) St. Louisville, Ohio 6/10 - One of those US geography articles. Good statistical information and map links. Little else.
 * 7) Plaza, North Dakota 6/10 - As above.
 * 8) Treaty of Versailles 7/10 - This article has been around for ages. In some ways a good article. Good images. A good coverage of the material. But needs more referencing. Not very neutral POV in some places. Alternative viewpoints need expansion.
 * 9) Ante-Fixae 4/10 Another stub.
 * 10) Shichigahama, Miyagi 4/10 Another stub.


 * 50% stubs
 * 20% US geography articles
 * 30% Reasonably good articles (although none of feature article standard)

Alexxx1 (talk/contribs) 05:44, 21 December 2005 (UTC)