User:Ali.panta/Ethnocentrism/Nick986282030 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Ali.panta
 * User:Ali.panta/Ethnocentrism

Lead

 * The lead has been updated; not only for the purposes of adding additional information but rephrasing, and in many ways, improving the overall quality of the article. This claim is mostly observed in the diction; I believe that the author was effective in communicating the core themes more effectively.
 * The lead does include an introductory sentence, providing readers with the context in which the term is used and the term's 'general' definition.
 * The lead also makes sure to make a point of reference to each of the major sections included in the article.
 * Overall, I believe that the author did a great job editing he lead section.

Content

 * The content added to the article is highly relevant to the core themes mentioned in the lead section of the article. More specifically, the content adds supplementary information to the existing section "origins and development" and further explores new themes (or applications of ethnocentrism) in social sciences and media
 * Given that the sources included in the rough draft originated between 2008 and 2015, I assume that the information is up to date.
 * Given that the author is editing a preexisting article with 5 different article sections (while contributing to two new additional sections), I have concluded that the most important information is included in the article.

Tone and Balance

 * The author was success in maintaining an overall tone and balance that is neutral in nature. All of the claims are supported by evidence (citations) and the author does not make any assumptions, nor is the text opinionated. In other words, the overall tone and balance reflects an neutral article without bias.
 * There are no claims that appear contradictory of conflicting. The author has made it clear that there are different frameworks in which the term can applied; anthropology and social science. With that said, the "anthropology" section of the article is much longer than the social science section; it might be more appropriate to balance the amount of information that is included in both sections.

Sources and References

 * All of the content included in the article are backed up by peer-reviewed academic sources and/or secondary sources with credible authors and publishers. There are no internet articles included in the page; the sources reflect that quality and quantity that is expected in this assignment.
 * The sources are comprehensive in nature and are published between 2008 and 2015, making them relatively up to date. All of the links in the article are currently operational.

Organization

 * The additional content is organized according to four different sections in the article, making the information easy to read and understanding its significance within the context of the topic. This clear organization is complimented by concise and easy to read writing and diction; the author has done a great job in the overall organization of the paper.
 * There are no noticeable spelling or grammatical errors in the draft (as of this review).

Images and Media

 * The author has not added images or media to supplement the information that he/she is presenting.

Overall impressions

 * Not only has the author improved the overall detail of the article by expanding the scope of analysis, the author has improved the overall reading experience by rephrasing sentences with greater clarity and conciseness; most of which is reflected in the improved diction. The strength in the added information can also be seen in quality of sources that support the information. With that said, it is clear that the "anthropology" section of the article towers over the "social section". suggesting that social science has relatively less significance; contradicting the introduction sentence on the lead section.