User:Alib2022/Glycoprotein/Kaitlynwu18 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Alib2022


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alib2022/Glycoprotein?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Glycoprotein

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead:

New content is included but some overlaps with content in the existing article so just make sure that your new content is integrated well. Lead briefly introduces article sections. Could be considered slightly overly detailed. Maybe the details about the structure could be in its own section.

Content:

The content is relevant and up-to-date.

Tone and Balance:

No viewpoints seem underrepresented or overrepresented. Some sentences have a casual tone.

Sources and References:

Sources and citations need to be added.

Organization:

Content is well-written, clear, and easy to read. Some sentences have awkward phrasing that can be changed.

Images and Media:

Images are well captioned.

Overall Impressions:

Synthesis section was nicely written with good detail. Some sentences have a casual tone, so maybe rephrase them slightly. Overall, an interesting read.