User:Alice.lous/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Psychiatry

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
Psychiatry is the field I plan to go into and study; I'm constantly research this topic, finding new things every day and want to continue to do that.

Evaluate the article
This article is very factual, it covers what psychiatry is, the background, and advancements. The talk page looks quite resourceful as the feedback is long and logical. It's easy to read and there are a lot of citations, reliable sources as they are from medical based websites; they're relevant and reflect the topic. It's an easy read, the information flows and holds relevancy throughout the entire article. Information is up to date due to it being general ideas and history; some things could be added such as what falls under the category of the profession and what can and can't be done in the field of psychiatry. I believe that this article is well-developed as it covers extensive information while remaining in a neutral tone. There is one claim that comes off as opinionated, that is what is the trustworthiness in the field; a majority may believe that you can't have trust in that field but it is still an opinion. This topic is quite leveled and does not include any content gaps.