User:Aliciaachavezz/sandbox

== Article Evaluation == Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Are there viewpoints that are over represented, or under represented? Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * yes
 * no
 * i'd say it is pretty neutral. I also did not notice any subjective language, strictly facts, no opinions.
 * I think the religious viewpoints on Sir Issac Newton are over represented. Especially when it stated that in his manuscript he dated 2060 as the end of time but then later mentions that that was only just a false prediction. its almost like... why include this if its nothing to our concern.
 * I checked three out of the 100+ links and all three of them work and support the claims located in the article
 * these are all neutral sources, at least the ones I opened, and they came from scholarly articles and books.
 * No information needs to be added and nothing that i've noticed is out of date.
 * there are edits on the actual birthdate of Isaac newton as well as concerns as to why there is no legacy section added to his wiki page
 * All of Newton's known writings on alchemy are currently being put online in a project undertaken by Indiana University. On the other hand, there are no ratings on this wiki page
 * wiki is different from how we discuss this in class because it is more in depth and goes into more details about the life of newton as opposed to how newton contributed to alchemy and such.