User:Aliciamsimpkins/Coparenting/S300777482 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Aliciamsimpkins
 * Link to draft you're review?Coparenting

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? No,It does not look like she's done anything to change this article.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, it explains what co-parenting is.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No, It doesn't have what other sections the article has.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? No, I think it has enough information to give you an idea of co-parenting.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? I think all of this content belongs.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes, it does not state any opinions at all.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? I think there could have been a little more written under Elective Co-parenting and Co-parenting by Two or more Adults.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, all of the website links she provided were very informational.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes, they all give information about the subjects she explained.
 * Are the sources current? A lot of these are up to date. Others are old but have some updated information. There were pages which were red that you could not access.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes, I went through most of the links and they worked.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? I cannot find any content that the reviewer changed. I feel this needs a little more information under some of the topics.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? I did not see any content added.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? I did not see any content added.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
I did not see any images listed therefore, I couldn't answer these questions.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes, this article has more information that makes it seem more complete.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? I like how it explains the different types of co-parenting. This allowed you to know different types of co-parenting.
 * How can the content added be improved? I think there could be a little more information under a couple of the topics that only have 1 or 2 sentences.