User:Alisha2003/Free Clinic/Haydenrandolph Peer Review

General info
Alisha2003
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:History and Social workers at free clinics
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Free clinic

Evaluate the drafted changes
Alisha added the section "Social workers at free clinics" to the article "Free clinic" and added to the "History" section. The introductory sentence of the "Social workers at free clinics" clearly explains how free clinics are a place where people who have experience discrimination and lack institutional healthcare. Therefore, it is necessary for practices within the free clinic that addresses the needs of patients who have experienced such factors leading them to come to the free clinic. This includes the crucial need for social workers to be present. This introduction to this new section to the article that Alisha provides is clear and concise. I can tell what the rest of the section will be about from her brief introduction and description.

The section Alisha added is very relevant to the topic of "Free clinic." I believe the presence of a social workers is a vital aspect of free clinics and important to bring attention to. The content added is up to date as the source used is from 2017. The content added to the section "History" is also relevant to provide more details on how the first free clinics set a new standard for healthcare and how it should be a right. At the end of the section she explains how the efforts of The Peoples' Free Medical Clinics was crucial in the passing of Meicare and Medicaid. This was a good addition because Meicare and Medicaid play such a key role in healthcare today.

The content added is neutral and non-biased. In the new section added, she simply explains how many people who come to free clinics have certain backgrounds and situations that would be helpful to have a social worker present to ensure the right care because they would be more aware of a patients circumstance.

The new content added is backed up by reliable secondary sources and accurately reflect what the source says. All the sources is somewhat current, from 2017 and 2011 and one written by a wide range of different authors. I checked the links and examined the source.

The content added is nicely organized as the introductory sentence of the new section added clearly explains what the section will be about which is the presence of social workers to ensure patients get the proper and better care for their circumstances. Then, more detail is added to explain why it is important to have social workers. The content added is concise, well organized, and easy to read. She added more detail after the first two sentences of the "History" section making a better flow for the rest of the section as more background is added. There were no grammatical errors that I caught.

There were no images or media added. The main article has images so I don't think there is a big need for any images to be added to this new section.

Overall, the content added improved the overall quality of the article because it is important to think about who the patients are that come into the free clinic and what their circumstances are like. Social workers are best suited to address it and make sure they are getting the proper care. A strength of the content added is introducing the term "situational factors" that contribute to patient's poor healthcare. That is something that could not be addressed enough and it is great that this new section sheds like on that. An improvement could be if there are any statistics or evidence showing how many people come into the free clinics under circumstances that require social workers. Maybe that is something the main article evaluates. Overall, very interesting to read.