User:Aljill/Anne Fletcher/Aperozo Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

aljill


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Aljill/Anne Fletcher
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Anne Fletcher

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Content: The additions generally encompassed more information about the films Anne Fletcher directed, or took part in some other role, such as choreographer or dancer. It made the article feel beefier, which I commend based on how short and bare-boned it is currently.

Organization: I think the greatest change to the article is in the writing itself. The article feels more complete and has a better flow with the additions made. No complaints.

Tone and Balance: I think the article feels very neutral, remarking the filmmaker/choreographer's moments of acclaim as well as their failures.

Sources: The sources are generally good, with widely-known entertainment and journalism sites as references. A lot of them give further support to the bibliography in the article at present, which I think is also nice. I do wish there were more individual and not supporting additions, but I feel it might be difficult to find articles written about Anne Fletcher in particular.

Overall: I think it is a good draft that adds a variety of appropriate sources to the article! I do wish there was a bit more on the newer things she might've done (like Dumplin', which I really liked and had no idea all these 2000s romcoms were also by her!), but I also understand finding those sources might be difficult.

RESPONSE:

-Thank you for this feedback! Very constructive and helpful!

-I completely forgot to add stuff about Dumplin' so thank you for reminding me I will work on that!