User:Allendq/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Liang Qichao

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose it because it needs attention from an expert in China and says that it has poor coverage and sourcing.

Evaluate the article
The lead section of the article is mostly good since it covers his main roles. It could use some work in being more specific on which theories and ideas he introduced, as well as exactly what type of political reform he advocated for. Additionally, information on the role of the newspaper seems unrelated to Liang's larger biography. Specific facts and statistics are given, but not cited. The writing of the article is generally good, but there are instances of redundancy where ideas could be made more concise. Further, some paragraph require more specificity. Exactly what reforms, social situations, or movements are happening?