User:Allibsusss/Patient advocacy/Vincentooi808 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Sianne Susbilla


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Patient advocacy
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Peer review

Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects:

Lead

Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?

Yes, the lead has been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer.


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?

Yes, the lead does include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic.


 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?

The lead does include a brief description of the article's major section.


 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?

The lead does include information that is not present in the article.


 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

The lead can be a bit more concise by detailing the topic more specifically.

Content

Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?

Yep, the content added is relevant to the topic.


 * Is the content added up-to-date?

Yes, the content is recent!


 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Majority of the content is relevant to the topic of study. Try to leave out some of the extra facts that might be a little irrelevant.


 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Yes, I believe so.

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?

The content added is neutral!


 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Nope!
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Nope.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * The content remains neutral!

Sources and References

Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes, all new content is backed up by a reliable secondary source of information.
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.)
 * Yes, the content accurately reflects what the cited sources say.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes!
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes, they are within 10 years.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Yes!
 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization

Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * The content is both concise and easy to read!
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No grammatical or spelling errors!
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes, it's well organized!

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Yes, the article does include images that are relevant to the topics covered!
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * The captions describe the image well!
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Yes they do!
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * Yep!