User:Allie99l/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose Diana Mantuana's article because she is one of my favorite people to research from Renaissance Italy. She's important because she is one of the first known female engravers and the way her she markets and promotes her work is very unique. My initial impression of the page is that it is a little short and the paragraphs present are a little dense.

Lead Section
It contains a brief introduction but seems a little overly detailed. It mentions her son but does not anywhere else in the article. Also she is more likely to be known as Diana Mantuana over Diana Scultori, but Diana Scultori is the leading title.

Content
The content is thorough and up to date. It is strange how much information of her life is put into the "Early Life" section, I feel like it could either be retitled or separated into different parts.

Tone and Balance
It appears to be fairly neutral with no apparent bias.

Sources and References
The sources, particularly the Evelyn Lincoln sources, are the most recent works written about Diana Mantuana. The links for the Database of Women Artists are broken.

Organization and Writing Quality
It could be more concise in the writing but the overall quality is good.

Images and Media
There could be more images that go along with the section on her most prominent works, but the images present are solid.

Talk Page
The talk page has discussion of the article's past errors and seeming bias and platitudes. The article was part of a 2015 Feminist Art edit-a-thon.

Overall impressions
The article is fairly well made. It's strengths lie in the thoroughness of the information and up to date information. It could be improved with a little more conciseness and perhaps images. It is pretty well developed, only slight edits probably need to be made.