User:Allthewall4/Internet meme/Bigtimenaenae Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Allison Wallace


 * Link to draft you're reviewing


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Internet meme - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I believe the article is structured well, and fairly easy to read without many if any grammatical errors. The lead is expected to be, but it was a good introduction to the topic at hand. Focusing on giving the subtitles more substance to them, not filler, but more backbone, which would in turn strengthen the article title.

Fixing the Copyright problem would get rid of the largest problem in this article I found. Now when it comes to the copyright section, I did not know this was a thing within articles, so that should probably be taken care of soon. But this does not really mess with my thoughts on the article as a whole. I am not sure that I would apply much more, rather than just cleaning up, existing content.

Is there something that the editor wanted to add, but want not able to? I am just curious.