User:Allysch/Dissociative disorders/Sawyerbrady44 Peer Review

General info
Allysch
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Allysch/Dissociative disorders:Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Dissociative disorders

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead needs to be change to include the new information provided in the sandbox. The lead is easy to read and concise. It could though, include more of the major points outlined in the article.

The content to be added to the article is definitely relevant to the subject matter presented in the article. It points to the fact that there is no real way to cure dissociative disorders. This information is up to date and factual. The article mentions studies that found associative disorders in people that have been historically underrepresented.

The content provided may be attempting to persuade people away from medications for this disorder by saying "psychotherapy is the best form of treatment that provides long term help." The first part of the content to be added is more informative and less persuasive.

There are several secondary sources throughout the article but they may be a bit outdated. The first reference in the Lead section is from 2006. There is a diverse spectrum of authors but there may be new literature on this topic available. Most of the references are from 2013 and are from the DSM IV.

The added content does not have any grammatical issues that I can tell. It is well-written and concise when it comes to explaining how medications will not work in this scenario.

There are only a few media images in the article and adding more photos could add to the article tremendously.

I do think that the content to be added is correct, but added citations and more information is definitely needed.