User:Almondmilk2/Alaina Urquhart/Dublin1501 Peer Review

Your lead provides a concise and clear introduction to Alaina Urquhart, summarizing her career as a podcaster, writer, and producer, as well as mentioning her debut novel, The Butcher and the Wren. Your introductory sentence describes your article's topic effectively and includes a brief description of the article's major sections, which helps the reader understand the structure of the article.

The content you added is a great overview of Alaina's life and career, covering her background, career in podcasting, her debut novel, and her other projects. The way you included details about her family life adds a personal touch. The content is up to date, which provides information about her projects in 2023. There doesn't appear to be any content that does not belong, and the information provided is well organized into the sections, I especially like the filmography table.

Your content appears neutral and unbiased, which focuses the article on Alaina's career and achievements. You don't seem to be trying to persuade the reader in favor of one position or another. The balance between her career in podcasting, writing, and personal life is maintained.

The references you have provided seem to be input properly and are well listed at the bottom of the article. You did a great job making sure to add the references into the filmography table.

Your information is sorted into sections that reflect the major points of the topic. Proper headings and subheadings have been used to separate different aspects of her life and career and the content you provided is mostly clear and easy to read, with no obvious errors.

Overall, the article’s information is relevant, comprehensive, and organized very well. The flow makes it very easy to read and pick up key information about Alaina. Good work and I’m so glad that you chose Alaina! Morbid is a great podcast.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)