User:Almostanne/The Woman's Building (Chicago)/Braej Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Almostanne


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Almostanne/The Woman's Building (Chicago)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * The Woman's Building (Chicago)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Overall well written and easy to read. There are a few grammatical errors (missing a few commas and apostrophes as well as one confusing sentence). The tone remains neutral through the duration of the article. All the added content is relevant to the topic and organized well. Five references were used which all seemed reliable except perhaps the second one where the source of the PDF was unclear, it had no references and there was no information on the author. The article improved Wikipedia's content on what was included in the interior of the exhibition.