User:Aloneinthewild/watchlist

Guiding principles for university articles: WP is not:
 * A Prospectus
 * A results service, rankings archive, archive of non notable student officers

Working on
 * Imperial College London, needs expansion
 * University of Mannheim, tidying up
 * University College London, neutrality, spillting to separate pages. more work needed
 * University of Aberdeen, citations needed throughout
 * University of London, maybe future GA - History, alumni needs sorting

University of Oxford GA From 2006
 * Lists of non prose (remove oxford in literature
 * Thin reputation section
 * Small history (anything 1680-1800?)
 * Single paragraph sections
 * Admissions citations
 * academic year short

pop culture move
 * other students at oxford section, gone?

University of Camb peer review AND You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas.
 * The lead seems a bit sparse for an article of this length. The lead should be an accessible and inviting overview of the whole article. Nothing important should be in the lead only - since it is a summary, it should all be repeated in the body of the article itself. My rule of thumb is to include every header in the lead in some way. Please see WP:LEAD
 * Article needs more references, for example Contributions to the advancement of science has zero effects. My rule of thumb is that every quote, every statistic, every extraordinary claim and every paragraph needs a ref.
 * Article is very list-y in places - these will need to be to converted to prose in most cases.
 * At least two sections are only one or two sentences - Publishing and Public Examinations (neither have refs either). Short sections should either be combined with others or perhaps expanded. Ditto for short paragraphs.
 * This is an extremely well known university - my guess is any errors or omissions will be caught in FAC, so make sure as much as possible is correct / complete as possible.
 * History seems very sparse for the second oldest English speaking University
 * This section is under development at User:Bluap/History_of_the_University_of_Cambridge. When he's got it in an editable state, we'll be able to flesh it out further and refine.
 * Per What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.[?]
 * Avoid including galleries in articles, as per Wikipedia:Galleries. Common solutions to this problem include moving the gallery to [//commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page wikicommons] or integrating images with the text.[?]
 * Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) may be too long – consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per Summary style.[?]
 * There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
 * arguably
 * might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[?]
 * Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
 * Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “ All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
 * Avoid misplaced formality: “in order to/for” (-> to/for), “thereupon”, “notwithstanding”, etc.
 * Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]