User:Along 2023/Consumer education/Ak302217 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Consumer Education Page


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Along 2023/Consumer education


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Consumer education

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

For the lead, adding information about what consumer education is and having a strong baseline definition will strengthen the audiences understanding. Although adding the sources are currently relevant there are some articles that will be less relevant soon. Adding information into the article that is more reliable and up to date will aid in the relevance of the article. The article and the sandbox are both neutral tones and do not show bias. The article is well written and organized, ye the sandbox needs adjustment. The sandbox needs to fix the grammar to create a concrete edit. I personally, think that the lack of addition of images is helpful to keep the information relevant and up-to-date. Currently, the sandbox is a template of where they would like to direct their focus and time for the weeks to come. After reading the article, we agree that focusing on the topics suggested "consumer education in family dynamics; psychology of fashion; health and nutrition in consumerism" will be very well rounded information that align with the focus of wikipedia.