User:Alpenschatz/Austromarxism/Md188 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Alpenschatz


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Alpenschatz/Red Vienna


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Red Vienna

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The article is off to a great start and shows valuable information on the topic. The links work correctly and there is nothing wrong on that aspect. Also, it is well organized and separated into different sections. However, more sources could be used to better help solidify your arguments. There are no images in this article and it could use some to give me a better visualization of the topic. As for maintaining a neutral standpoint on the topic you do a well job. In conclusion I would say that you are heading ing he right direction but can add more insight to really grab the readers attention such as pictures or more information.