User:Alteevo/Boston Option/Jayla987 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Alteevo


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * 


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Does not exists

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead is good, it tells me upfront what a Boston option is. The also does not just repeat what is in the article below it.

The article it self has a neutral point of view. It does not sound or feel bias what so ever. Since this is a new article it does have more than 3 secondary sources independent of the subject. The article also does a good job of linked other related articles from Wikipedia to it. This makes it a more discoverable experience for the viewer. The structured of the article is good as well, but re name the section parts. I feel like leaving the section name as article body isn't really that good, nor does it tell me what that section is going to be about. The article is very clear and easy to read, and I do not see any grammar or spelling issues. Good Job Alteevo the article is good. :)