User:Altheadulany/Evaluate an Article

Evaluating the Wikipedia page "Carefree Black Girls"

Lead Section:

The introductory sentence is clear and concise without rambling or elaborating too far on the article's topic. The lead does not introduce the article's major sections. The lead is pretty concise but is the most detailed part of the article, probably because the article is very short and needs more detail and expansion.

Content:

The article's content is completely relevant to the topic and very contemporary and up-to-date. There is no content that does not belong but the creator of the page could definitely expand the article and include more information. The article does address a topic related to a historically underrated population.

Tone and Balance:

The article is neutral and there are no heavily biased claims. It does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor or against any position.

Sources and References:

The links work and the sources appear to be current. Many of the facts link and cite thorough secondary sources. The sources have a diverse array of authors and include historically marginalized authors. There are definitely more reliable sources available but again that is probably because the article needs more work and expansion.

Organization and writing quality:

The article is concise and easy to read. It does not have any grammatical or spelling errors It is organized and broken into sections but again there is not much content so there is not much to be organized

Images and Media:

There are no images included.

Talk page discussion:

There is nothing in the talk page discussion.

Overall impressions:

The article definitely needs to be expanded upon with more organization and information, it is a bit underdeveloped and not totally complete. The information and sourcing that is there is strong and I do not have any complaints about the content that is already there.