User:AltusLinguini/Antonio Giménez-Rico/OsoBean Peer Review

Lead


 * There is no lead, the article begins with a biography

Content


 * The content is relevant to the topic
 * The content is up to date
 * There could be more information about certain details and dates in the person's life. All of the information seems to belong in the article. It could tell more information about certain movies, their receptions, and facts surrounding them. The content could be structured differently as well, adding a lead with the essential information then separating into personal life and career.
 * There is a typo with the long quote
 * there could also be more information about the ADIRCE and what it does, also needs a citation

Tone and Balance


 * The content appears to be neutral and avoids taking stances, it is more a lack of information that holds the page back

Sources and References


 * The sources are good and cited correctly, but the page has few sources and certain phrases could use a citation, such as the claim that he founded and directed the ADIRCE

Organization


 * As mentioned, the article could be expanded with different sections for more clarity, following the structure of other critics/directors

Images and media


 * The article could use an image of the figure if such an image exists, otherwise there is no media to criticize

Overall impressions


 * This article needs a lot of work it's just a wall of text right now with little organization and not a lot of development. Could also exist in english. There's a lot of good information there but it needs support and structure.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)