User:Alukyo1/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Roger Parker

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I've always been interested in music and wanted to explore something that I don't know too much about in the realm of music. Opera Scholarships caught my eye because I wasn't sure if that indicated it being an article about resources for students and professionals pursuing opera or if 'scholarships' was a musical terminology I was unaware of. Ultimately, I realized that these articles talk about individuals who were scholars in opera and outline their biography.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The article seems incomplete or some leads don't seem as detailed as others. The overall tone seems neutral and includes lots of links to other articles that talk about this artists' pieces and productions. There are no pictures so it seems like a lot of text. At first sight, the article seems concise and structured, but there are lots of topics being brought into discussion that compound into a list of accomplishments. As an example, under the section of "Preparation of critical editions of operas", this is purely a list of his contributions and participations in other editions but not the actual preparation of these collaborations.

~