User:AlveoliRavioli/Norovirus/GreatDane15 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? AlvieoliRavioli
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:AlveoliRavioli/Norovirus

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? There is no lead in the sandbox, only questions about the article that the user wants to answer.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? There is no lead and it is unclear which portions of the article the questions are addressed to.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? There are no sections that are noted, and the questions seem to come from all over the article.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? There is information stated that is not included in the article but there is only one source and I am not sure where the information would be placed within the article.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? The questions are somewhat confusing and the answers the user has given are not cited, yet the information is easy to understand.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? There are questions related to the Norovirus article but I am unsure of which portion of the article that they are discussing.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? The information was gathered from sources that were published within the last 5 years so the information is relevant and up to date.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? There is a lot of content missing related to the Norovirus and it is confusing as to how the information presented will be added into the article.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? This article does not deal with these issues.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? The tone does not seem to be opinionated but the information is not cited nor is it clearly neutral.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? There does not seem to be bias.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? There are not any viewpoints that I can understand that are presented, therefore I do not think any are under or overrepresented.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? There is not a persuasive tone within the article additions the user wants to make.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? The content mentioned is from secondary sources.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? The sources are all relevant to the topic of the Norovirus according to the general information and specific information.
 * Are the sources current? The sources are all published within the last five years.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Each source is from a different author.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? The links work and I am able to find the article using the citations.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? The content is easy to understand yet I am unsure as to where in the article the information would go.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? There are no grammatical or spelling errors.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? The content is confusing to understand where the information should go and what it is talking about.

Organization evaluation

 * Overall impressions

Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? There are no additions, rather questions and answers made.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The user is questioning the article and making sure the information is up to date.
 * How can the content added be improved? The information is confusing as to where it is coming from and where it should go in the article, no additions are made.