User:Alyssabri99/Jacqueline Casey/Stevengordillo Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (Alyssabri99)
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Jacqueline Casey

The Lead is short and to the point, guessing from the rest of the article, there is no much to say about the person. She has done work within one university and it describes/ introduces her to the point. I can easily identify the topic and the major sections. Detailed and concise.

The content is relevant to the topic and to its person. The content is up to date- the person passed away many years ago and the latest information seems to be there.

Tone and balance is very professional. The information is stated, no bias. Everything is very well presented, wording and flow make the reading interesting.

The Seven sources are enough for the information that is presented, they are also current to the persons last achievements, including death article. All links work.

All the information on there is very little that the information is automatically very well organized. Broken down perfectly MIT, Legacy and awards and Honors.I copied into word, no errors.

The images are of her artwork. Could have been of the person. cant tell if Images are abiding the copyright regulations. Seems as if images were there prior to project.