User:Am2314/Dihybrid cross/Kirsten.bures Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Am2314, Kjindra


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Am2314/Dihybrid_cross?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Dihybrid cross

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead is well organized and clearly explains the main ideas in a way that your average people can understand. I like how you made a section about the Mendelian History. It is a really big part of the dihybrid cross so having it as its own specific section gives it the importance it needs. I would add in the other two laws in that section as well just so people have an idea of what they all are because law 2 is mentioned in the "expected genotype and phenotype ratio" section. I think the words you chose to use are great and I don't think you would have to worry about changing those. The content overall is neutral and the sources are reliable. I know you said you had some images you wanted to add so I am curious to see those because the ones in this article could be improved! In the genotype and phenotype ratio section, I like how it breaks down the 9:3:3:1 ratio and explains what each number is made up of. Overall I think the content you added makes the article a lot stronger, more reliable, and a lot better quality!