User:Ama042/Dental pulp stem cell/Jjt010 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Ama042

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Ama042/Dental pulp stem cell
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Dental pulp stem cell

Evaluate the drafted changes
The writer did an overall good job with the composition of their edits for the article. The edits were concise and clear and gave extra scientific background for the reader to understand. Compared to the original article the content was relevant and maintained a neutral tone throughout not persuading the reader. There were some grammatical errors, which included mis-punctuation, and insufficient article use. The author should provide the direct links for the articles used within the references so readers can easily access them and check them for reliability.