User:Amaini15/Northern Cyprus Water Supply Project/Giacorbett Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info
User: Amaini15

Article: Northern Cyprus Water Supply Project

Lead evaluation
The lead was not updated, however it reflects information mentioned in the article and provides a concise description of the article's topic.

Content evaluation
The content is relevant to the topic and is an important addition to the article. The information is up-to-date and doesn't seem out of place. Some of the information in the article mentions a historically underrepresented population.

Tone and balance evaluation
The content added in neutral and doesn't try to persuade you to support a certain viewpoint. There doesn't seem to be any bias and multiple viewpoints are equally represented.

Sources and references evaluation
All the sources are current and all links work. They are written by different authors and are reliable sources. Most of the statements in the article are backed up by one of the references.

Organization evaluation
The content is easy to read and doesn't include any unnecessary information. It is organized well and the heading reflects the information presented in the sections. There are no spelling errors and only a couple grammatical errors.

Images and media evaluation
No images or media was added to the article.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

New Article Evaluation
This was a pre-existing article. The article is notable and includes links to other Wikipedia articles.

Overall evaluation
The content added is relevant to the topic and an important addition to the article. The content is informative and clear. It is organized well and adds important information that is not mentioned anywhere else in the article. The article could be improved by adding citations to more statements.