User:Amaiya99/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)Atmospheric science

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because atmospheric science and things having to do with the climate on earth have always interest me. I have always found the topic to be interesting and I knew when I saw the picture of earth from outer space that it would be something that I would be interested in.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation look like

Overall, I do feel that this article is well written. The introduction of the article was well written and introduced what the article was going to be about. The content of the article is all relevant to the topic and none of the information seems to outweigh any of the other information. From reading the article, the tone seems to be very neutral. This article seems to be very informative and factual so I don't believe there was anything in the article that could be seen as biased. In one section of the article, there were no links or any sources at all. I personally feel that if you want people to read the article and find it believable that there need to be sources in every section so that you can prove that your article can be backed up. The article is very clear to read and makes plenty of sense. The images and media in the article was well chosen and I do like the caption of each image. There are no discussions going on on the talk page of the article. Overall, I really did enjoy the article and I felt that it was very informative. To improve the article, citations need to be added to the section of the article where there were no links or citations, just so the article can be seen as a reliable source.