User:AmanDwivedi11/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Amazon Rekognition

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I have always be fascinated by new technologies and advancement in the sciences. Amazona Rekognition seems like an interesting software in computer science and reading the title of the article just piqued my interest. I just chose this article to read and learn about something new while learning how to evaluate articles on wikipedia.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

1) The content of the articles seems to be closely related to the topic. It explains the topic well and draws a timeline as well explaining how the software has been developed over time. I feel that there is only one issue with the article, that they have not talked about the current state of the software. The last update regarding it was in 2020 and it has been 2 years since there has been an update on the topic.

2) The article sounds neutral. It has evaluated the topic without any bias. Although, I believe it should have talked more about the viewpoints regarding the software and how it actually functions.

3) The links of the citations are working properly. However, some sources are directly from Amazon. Therefore, it raises questions about the credibility of this article. The company who owns the service is only listed as the source which can make this article biased towards them.

4) The talk page is not much useful. It tells about the author, that he doe not have any affiliations with amazon. This article does not have a rating and it is from a single author therefore it would not be right to trust this source.