User:Amanda Larson/sandbox

- Castillo, M. “Writer's Block.” American Journal Of Neuroradiology, vol. 35, no. 6, 2014, pp. 1043–1044.
https://umbrella.lib.umb.edu/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_wos000337652900002&context=PC&vid=01MA_UMB&lang=en_US&search_scope=Everything&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=default_tab&query=any,contains,writers%20block&offset=0

- I want to talk about specifics mentioned in this article on how writer's block can physically be proven or shown in what areas it effects in the brain.

- I want to talk about specific studies mentioned, such as the testing between people that speak languages other than english and if write's block effects them the same way

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

- Rose, Mike, and Michael Anthony Rose. Writer's block: The cognitive dimension. SIU Press, 2009.

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED248527.pdf

- On page 26, I want to add information from the diagram with ways you can try to help writers block as a way to add a section/ add to a section about how to help cure/ alleviate the frustration of writer's block and the symptoms that come along with it.

- On page 21-23 I want to add to the reasoning behind writers block with some information shown on these pages.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

- Rose, Mike. "Rigid rules, inflexible plans, and the stifling of language: A cognitivist analysis of writer's block." College Composition and Communication 31.4 (1980): 389-401.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/356589?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents

- On page 398, talk about the depth of the analysis shown in this part of the reading; talk about how it can stem and WHY.

- Address a misconception of how and why writers block can stem, also talked about on page 398.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 DRAFT: 

(starting new paragraph)

'''Physical damage can produce writer's block. If a person experiences tissue damage in the brain, i.e. a stroke, it is likely to lead to other complications apart from the lesion itself. This damage causes an extreme form of writer's block known as agraphia. With agraphia, the inability to write is due to issues with the cerebral cortex; this disables the brain's process of translating thoughts into writing. Those with this disorder are typically born able to processes this information correctly, meaning regardless of previous abilities, one can develop this form of writer's block due to solely physical injury. '''

A link to the article I am editing:

Writer's block

Hey: this is SOHA> Feedback-  The Source looks legit. A few sentences seems like it is just on the border line of being repeated verbatim. I would look through the sentences and change them up a bit. The paragraph you wrote seems like it is placed in the right spot. Nice Job. Also, "thing" is very general. When I go to wikipedia, I get my direct answer. The answer might not always be accurate, but I never not get an answer. If you take "thing" out, your sentence will still make sense. Also in the first sentence the whole sentence sounds like its not going anywhere. Again as a reader... I do not care about the writing, I care about the facts. The citation is inserted correctly. Awesome!