User:Amandalydon/Hallgrímskirkja/UW AE 2024 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Amandalydon


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Hallgrímskirkja
 * Hallgrímskirkja

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:


 * Introductory sentence is good.
 * Lead doesn't include brief description of the articles major sections.
 * The lead is concise.

Content:


 * Content added is relevant.
 * Could have more information about architect and design competition.
 * Could have more information about the design of the building.
 * Could have more information on how the church is in contrast to to surrounding city.

Tone and balance:


 * The content is neutral
 * Does not try to persuade reader.
 * Viewpoints represented well.

Sources and References:


 * Sources are from within the past 5 years.
 * The links work.
 * The sources are through about the topic.
 * The content accurately reflects what the sources say.

Organization:


 * The content added is well written.
 * No grammar errors to my knowledge.
 * Could break up the content with headers to better organize the information.

Images:


 * Images are good
 * Captions are descriptive

Conclusion:

Good article, the one thing is to break up the description into more sections so that it is easier to understand.