User:Amarq030/Cradle of Humankind/Citmoreno9 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Amarq030)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Cradle of Humankind


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Cradle of Humankind

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The feedback given by my peer is shown on the edited version of the article. The information given is relevant to the topic and it gives more specific dates and new names that contribute to the topic of the article. The content added has reliable sources and is not biased, it's neutral. The sources used are current and are backed up by a reliable secondary source. The sources all correlate to the topic of the article and do not drive away from the main idea. The organization of the article is clear and formatted clearly and broken down into sections. There are a few images that help decapitate the sections and give a clearer understanding while having a visual appeal. The article does a good job in explains the subject. The only criticism I would give the editor would be to go more in depth in the last section of the visitor centers, explain what they showcase in their center. The strength of the article is mainly held in the history of discoveries, the section that should get a little bt more attention would be the visitor center section. Overall, it's a strong article that informs us of the Cradle of Humankind.