User:AmarraD./Ascension Missionary Baptist Church/Court.pow2 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

AmarraD.


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:AmarraD./Ascesnsion Missionary Baptist Church


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * None

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: Your lead is great. I love that you put in very relevant and up to date information about how COVID-19 has caused the church to change. I would just say to not repeat “the church” at the beginning of your sentences as often.

Content: You provide a lot of great information. It is all very relevant to your topic and organized well. The topic chosen is also notable as it covers an underrepresented topic. All of your content helps in the understanding of the topic. I didn’t find anything wrong with your article or out of place. It all fits very well and I think you’ve created a very balanced and informational article.

Tone and Balance: Your tone is very good and fits perfectly with the Wikipedia style. Also, your balance on each topic is great. You provide a lot of different information on each section.

Sources and References: I understand that it’s harder to find information on your topic, but your references are pretty limited. The only one really listed is the church’s website and its various pages. Nevertheless, you got some really good and relevant information form these sources.

Organization: Your organization is great. It is a very easy article to read through and understand because you’ve laid it out so well. The different sections you provide really help in understanding the church better and creating a great flow.

Images and Media: I like that you’ve added a photo of the church, but I would say to add a few more pictures if you can in order to elevate your article.

Overall: I think your article draft is great. I couldn’t find any issues other than adding more pictures and sources (if possible) to your article.