User:AmarraD./Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Six (musical)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
It is something I know, understand and have seen. I'm familiar with the topic so it should logically be easier to evaluate. As a piece of entertainment it is possible for there to be errors such as expressions of emotions and opinions that are biased. My first impression for the article's opening is that it is straight to the point and factual. It provides sources for its information and has Wiki links to a significant amount of topics. Which makes sense considering the musical is based on historical figures. Its well written and details the life of the musical in a neutral yet effective way.

Evaluate the article
The lead is well written, and while brief, it provides all the necessary information to open up the article and introduce the topic.

While it does not address any equality topics it does have up to date information on performances, and all the information in the article sticks closely to the contents of the musical, it's creators, and its creation.

The article describes the play with the most accurate adjectives as possible to explain the situation and happenings while keeping a neutral stance. The author(s) doesn't go out of their way to make one person, place, performance, or character sound more appealing/ better than another. As such, there is no persuasion involved.

The article has over 50 resources with links that do work, with some reliable and diverse sources (from Vogue, to Playbill, to New York Times, to Broadway News), and with some as recent as December 19th 2020.

While the article is organized and well sectioned, I did find the occasional missing word or fragmented sentence. There was nothing so egregious that it was impossible to comprehend or so extreme that I would have an aversion to competing the article. Aside from that the article was an easy read and it was very easy to navigate.

There is only a single image and it is a poster for the Musical with the main cast displayed. I feel the article would be enhanced by official/ approved screenshots or photos of the performance. Not necessarily of the individual performers because depending on the location and show it may not be the main cast.

The article for Six (Musical) is part of the Musical's section of WikiProjects, and in the talk section they are having polite and sensible conversations about the Play and what information to provide, such as changing the image for the poster since it was updated or leaving it as is. It seems to be very similar to how it is described in the modules. It is rearguard as a C-class article.

I feel like the article will be in perpetual progress because of what the article has established to provide. So long as the musical is still running then there will be more posters to question the position of, there will be more show locations and cast to speak on. Until the play ends completely there will always be new tours and information. I believe in its current state it could use a bit of editing, grammar and sentence structure wise, but aside form that it is a very concise and to the point article that provided facts not opinions. It uses good descriptors for situations wile keeping a neutral tone.