User:Amassey1/Gas chromatography/MaryGrace J. Larsen Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Remove the words common, frequently, and typical (very difficult to prove commonness factually)

Intro is an excellent overview and includes pertinent but general information on GC (which is how the intro is supposed to be). Written objectively, presenting only facts not opinions (once words like frequently and typically are removed).

History section includes representative information without including opinions.

In Inlet section on S/SL, preferred/best suited for split vs splitless is difficult to prove, maybe choose other words or directly cite that sentence with proof?

Need citation for PTV Injector subsection. Also include what PTV stands for.

Need citations for Gas Source Inlet, P/T, and final paragraph of Inlets subsection.

Need citations in Carrier gas selection and flow rates, inlet types and flow rates, column selection, data reduction and analysis, and applications sections.

Overall, adds a lot of relevant information. Excellent work! The only issues I see are a lack of citations in places and a few instances of wording issues.