User:AmazingJus/sandbox/indiaeng

Phonology
Indian accents vary greatly. Most Indians speak with a more vernacular, native-tinted accent.

Vowels
In general, the Indian English has fewer peculiarities in its vowel sounds than the consonants, especially as spoken by native speakers of languages like Hindi, the vowel phoneme system having some similarities with that of English. Among the distinctive features of the vowel-sounds employed by some Indian English speakers:
 * Modern Indians, especially a minority of English students and teachers along with some people in various professions like telephone customer service agents, often speak with a non-rhotic accent. Examples of this include flower pronounced as, never as , water as etc.
 * Most South Indian English speakers have the tail-tale split which is unique to South Indians, affecting word pairs such as plain/plane, main/mane and eight/ate (/, / and, , respectively)
 * Many North Indians have a sing-song quality as they speak English, which perhaps, results from a similar tone used while speaking Hindi. Indian English speakers have the cot-caught merger and thus do not make a clear distinction between and.
 * Some Indian speakers, especially in the South, often do not pronounce the rounded or, realizing both as  instead. This makes not sound as [nat]. The phoneme , if used, is only semi-rounded at the lips.. Similarly, in South India coffee will be pronounced kaafi, copy will be kaapi
 * Most Indians have the trap–bath split of Received Pronunciation, affecting words such as class, staff and last (, and  respectively). Though the trap-bath split is prevalent in Indian English, it varies greatly. Many younger Indians who read and listen to American English do not have this split. The distribution is somewhat similar to Australian English in Regional Indian English varieties, but it has a complete split in Cultivated Indian English and Standard Indian English varieties.

Consonants
Among the most distinctive features of consonants in Indian English are:
 * Pronunciations vary between rhotic and non-rhotic; with pronunciations leaning towards native phonology being generally rhotic, and others being non-rhotic.
 * Standard Hindi and most other vernaculars (except Punjabi, Marathi, Assamese and Bengali) do not differentiate between (voiced labiodental fricative) and  (voiced labiovelar approximant). Instead, many Indians use a frictionless labiodental approximant  for words with either sound, possibly in free variation with  and/or  depending upon region. Thus, wet and vet are often homophones.
 * Related to the previous characteristic, many Indians prefer to pronounce words such as as [flaː(r)], as opposed to [flaʊə(r)], and as [aː(r)] as opposed to [aʊə(r)].
 * The voiceless plosives are always unaspirated in Indian English,  (aspirated in cultivated form) whereas in RP, General American and most other English accents they are aspirated in word-initial or stressed syllables. Thus "pin" is pronounced  in Indian English but  in most other dialects. In native Indian languages (except in Dravidian languages such as Tamil), the distinction between aspirated and unaspirated plosives is phonemic, and the English stops are equated with the unaspirated rather than the aspirated phonemes of the local languages. The same is true of the voiceless postalveolar afficate.
 * The alveolar stops English, are often retroflex , , especially in the South of India. In Indian languages there are two entirely distinct sets of coronal plosives: one dental and the other retroflex. Native speakers of Indian languages prefer to pronounce the English alveolar plosives sound as more retroflex than dental, and the use of retroflex consonants is a common feature of Indian English. In the Devanagari script of Hindi, all alveolar plosives of English are transcribed as their retroflex counterparts. One good reason for this is that unlike most other native Indian languages, Hindi does not have true retroflex plosives (Tiwari, [1955] 2001). The so-called retroflexes in Hindi are actually articulated as apical post-alveolar plosives, sometimes even with a tendency to come down to the alveolar region. So a Hindi speaker normally cannot distinguish the difference between their own apical post-alveolar plosives and English's alveolar plosives. However, languages such as Tamil have true retroflex plosives, wherein the articulation is done with the tongue curved upwards and backwards at the roof of the mouth. This also causes (in parts of Uttar Pradesh and Bihar) the  preceding alveolar  to allophonically change to  (  → ). Mostly in south India, some speakers allophonically further change the voiced retroflex plosives to voiced retroflex flap, and the nasal  to a nasalised retroflex flap.
 * Many speakers of Indian English do not use the voiced postalveolar fricative . Some Indians use or  instead, e.g. treasure, and in the south Indian variants, with  as in <"sh'"ore>, e.g. treasure.
 * All major native languages of India (except Bengali) lack the dental fricatives ( and ; spelled with th). Usually, the aspirated voiceless dental plosive is substituted for  in the north (it would be unaspirated in the south) and the unaspirated voiced dental plosive, or possibly the aspirated version , is substituted for . For example, "thin" would be realised as  instead of  for North Indian speakers, whereas it would be pronounced unaspirated in the south.
 * South Indians tend to curl the tongue (retroflex accentuation) more for and.
 * Most Indian languages (except Urdu varieties and Assamese) lack the voiced alveolar fricative /z/. A significant portion of Indians thus, even though their native languages do have its nearest equivalent: the unvoiced /s/, often use the voiced palatal affricate (or postalveolar) /dʒ/, just as with a Korean accent. This makes words such as and sound as [ˈdʒiːro] and [ˈroːdʒiː] (the latter, especially in the North). This replacement is equally true for Persian and Arabic loanwords into Hindi. The probable reason is the confusion created by the use of the Devanagari grapheme < ज > (for /dʒ/) with a dot beneath it to represent the loaned /z/ (as < ज़ >). This is common among people without formal English education.
 * Many Indians with lower exposure to English also may pronounce /f/ as aspirated voiceless bilabial plosive [pʰ]. Again note that in Hindi (Devanagari) the loaned /f/ from Persian and Arabic is written by putting a dot beneath the grapheme for native [pʰ] < फ >: < फ़ >. This substitution is rarer than that for [z], and in fact in many Hindi /f/ is used by native speakers instead of /pʰ/, or the two are used interchangeably.
 * Inability to pronounce certain (especially word-initial) consonant clusters by people of rural backgrounds, as with some Spanish-speakers. This is usually dealt with by epenthesis. e.g., school.
 * Sometimes, Indian speakers interchange and, especially when plurals are being formed, unlike speakers of other varieties of English, who use [s] for the pluralisation of words ending in a voiceless consonant, [z] for words ending in a voiced consonant or vowel, and [ɨz] for words ending in a sibilant.
 * Again, in Assamese and dialects like Bhojpuri, all instances of are spoken like, a phenomenon which is also apparent in their English. Exactly the opposite is seen for many Bengalis.
 * In Assamese, and  is pronounced as ; and  and  is pronounced as . Retroflex and dental consonants are not present and only alveolar consonants are used unlike other Indian languages. Similar to Bengali,  is pronounced as  and  in Assamese. For example; change is pronounced as, vote is pronounced as  and English is pronounced as.
 * In case of the postalveolar affricates, native languages like Hindi have corresponding affricates articulated from the palatal region, rather than postalveolar, and they have more of a stop component than fricative; this is reflected in their English.
 * Whilst retaining in the final position, many Indian speakers add the  sound after it when it occurs in the middle off a word. Hence  →  (ringing).
 * Syllabic, and  are usually replaced by the VC clusters ,  and  (as in button ), or if a high vowel precedes, by  (as in little ). Syllable nuclei in words with the spelling er/re (a schwa in RP and an r-coloured schwa in GA) are also replaced VC clusters. e.g., metre,  →.
 * Indian English uses clear [l] in all instances like Irish English whereas other varieties use clear [l] in syllable-initial positions and dark [l] (velarised-L) in coda and syllabic positions.

Spelling pronunciation
A number of distinctive features of Indian English are due to "the vagaries of English spelling". Most Indian languages, unlike English, have a nearly phonetic spelling, so the spelling of a word is a highly reliable guide to its modern pronunciation. Indians' tendency to pronounce English phonetically as well can cause divergence from Western English.
 * In words where the digraph  represents a voiced velar plosive in other accents, some Indian English speakers supply a murmured version, for example . No other accent of English admits this voiced aspiration.
 * Similarly, the digraph  may be aspirated as or, resulting in realisations such as , found in no other English accent. However, this is somewhat similar to the traditional distinction between wh and w present in English, wherein the former is /ʍ/, whilst the latter is /w/.
 * In unstressed syllables, which speakers of American English would realise as a schwa, speakers of Indian English would use the spelling vowel, making sound as [ˈsæniti] instead of [ˈsænəti]. This trait is also present in other South Asian dialects (i.e. Pakistani and Sri Lankan English), and in RP, etc.
 * Final  is almost always pronounced as schwa /ə/ in other dialects (exceptions include words such as ); but in Indian English the ending  is pronounced as the long open central unrounded vowel /aː/ (as in ) instead of /ə/. So,  is pronounced as /ˈɪnɖɪaː/ instead of /ˈɪndɪə/, and as /ˈsoːfaː/ instead of /ˈsoʊfə/.
 * The word "of" is usually pronounced with a instead of a  as in most other accents.
 * Use of instead of  for the "-ed" ending of the past tense after voiceless consonants, for example "developed" may be  instead of RP.
 * Use of instead of  for the "-s" ending of the plural after voiced consonants, for example may be  instead of.
 * Pronunciation of as [hauz] in both the noun and the verb, instead of [haus] as noun and [hauz] as verb.
 * The digraph  is pronounced as [tz] or [tdʒ] instead of [ts] (voicing may be assimilated in the stop too), making  sound like [ˈsʋɪtzərlænd] instead of [ˈswɪtsəɹlənd].
 * In RP, occurs only before a vowel. But some speakers of Indian English, primarily in the South, use  in almost all positions in words using the letter 'r', similar to most American and some Irish dialects. The allophone used is a mild trill or a tap. Indian speakers do not typically use the retroflex approximant  for , which is common for American English speakers.
 * All consonants are distinctly doubled (lengthened) in most varieties of Indian English wherever the spelling suggests so. e.g.,.
 * In certain words, especially Latinate words ending in ile, is pronounced [ɪ] in America and [aɪ] in Britain. Indian English, like most other Commonwealth dialects, will invariably use the British pronunciation. Thus, would be pronounced as [ˈtɛnsaɪl] like the British, rather than [ˈtɛnsɪl] like the American;, on the other hand, use , as [ˈænti] like in Britain, rather than [ˈæntaɪ] like in America. Similar effects of British colonisation are 're', 'ise', and 'our' spellings in words like 'metre', 'realise', and 'endeavour', respectively, which Americans would spell as 'meter', 'realize' and 'endeavor'.
 * Deletion is not commonly used. For example, "salmon" is usually pronounced with a distinct "l".

Supra-segmental features
English is a stress-timed language, and both syllable stress and word stress, where only certain words in a sentence or phrase are stressed, are important features of received pronunciation. Indian native languages are actually syllable-timed languages, like Latin and French. Indian-English speakers usually speak with a syllabic rhythm. Further, in some Indian languages, stress is associated with a low pitch, whereas in most English dialects, stressed syllables are generally pronounced with a higher pitch. Thus, when some Indian speakers speak, they appear to put the stress accents at the wrong syllables, or accentuate all the syllables of a long English word. Certain Indian accents are of a "sing-song" nature, a feature seen in a few English dialects in Britain, such as Scouse and Welsh English.