User:Amberwilloughby

Amberwilloughby
I am new to Wikipedia and have recently edited the Dr Gus Casely-Hayford page. I did this to learn about editing info on Wikipedia and to try to make slight improvements to the page. I hope that the editing is light and helpful. However, if anyone has any problem at all with the revisions, please feel free to undo them.

Feb 2010

re Col blimp
NOTE TO SELF - Before my edits, my view on the Col Blimp article waa v. positive and still is. was going to recommend recognition of quality. ... Was going to put para below on talk page.

Article quality
It is March 21, 2010 and, as it stands, this article appears to be very, very good. It seems lucid, informative and pretty comprehensive. I also found it lively, interesting, well-paced and not too long. It's a pleasure to read an article that has these qualities: an unusually comfortable read, for a Wikipedia article. It seems to deserve a much higher grade than 'C' on the WikiProject Films quality scale. Can someone tell me how to nominate this article for recognition so that it can be gently shunted up the scale?