User:Amcappi/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Gregory Horror Show (video game)


 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is it written neutrally? Yes
 * Does each claim have a citation? No
 * Are the citations reliable? Yes
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)? No
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
 * The article's content is relevant to the topic. It is written neutrally and there are a decent amount of sources. References are only really present for the games rating with multiple game journalist companies. The citations are reliable and the article does not tackle a equity gap. The talk page is empty and it is rated as a Start page.
 * The article's content is relevant to the topic. It is written neutrally and there are a decent amount of sources. References are only really present for the games rating with multiple game journalist companies. The citations are reliable and the article does not tackle a equity gap. The talk page is empty and it is rated as a Start page.


 * Sources
 * https://www.ign.com/articles/2003/08/13/hands-on-gregory-horror-show could be used to cite story/gameplay elements
 * https://www.ign.com/articles/2003/01/16/cgd-03-gregory-horror-show notes the cult following of the show in japan and how Capcom hoped to replicate this
 * https://www.eurogamer.net/r-gregoryhorrorshow-ps2 and additional review sources already present in order to flesh out the review section as seen in other game articles

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Lovely Muco


 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is it written neutrally? Yes
 * Does each claim have a citation? No
 * Are the citations reliable? Yes
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)? No
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
 * The article's content is relevant to the topic. It is written neutrally and there are a good amount of sources. References are mostly used to corroborate the release dates of the volumes. The citations are reliable and the article does not tackle a equity gap. The talk page is very small and only seems to talk about finding a source that proves the main character dog is a shiba inu. It is a stub.
 * The article's content is relevant to the topic. It is written neutrally and there are a good amount of sources. References are mostly used to corroborate the release dates of the volumes. The citations are reliable and the article does not tackle a equity gap. The talk page is very small and only seems to talk about finding a source that proves the main character dog is a shiba inu. It is a stub.


 * Sources
 * https://www.crunchyroll.com/anime-news/2015/11/14/dining-with-the-inspiration-for-lovely-muuuuuuuco could be used to add a section talking about how the manga is based off the author's pet shiba inu
 * https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/interest/2016-10-11/lovely-muco-real-life-counterpart-gets-photo-book/.107514 could be used to validate the claim the dog is a shiba inu, again section on it being based off a real dog and could be added onto the section for volume 10
 * https://icv2.com/print/article/51566 add on to media possibly? since it is a new rights acquisition

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Pokémon TCG Online


 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is it written neutrally? Yes
 * Does each claim have a citation? No
 * Are the citations reliable? Yes
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)? No
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
 * The article's content is relevant to the topic. It is written neutrally and there are a decent amount of sources. References are pretty evenly distributed. The citations are reliable and the article does not tackle a equity gap. The talk section is quite empty and only had a user list some problems (some of which fixed). It is a start page.


 * Sources
 * https://www.ign.com/articles/2014/10/20/pokemon-trading-card-game-online-review used to expand review section
 * https://www.pokemon.com/us/pokemon-news/pokemon-tcg-live-available-in-select-countries-and-territories-in-limited-beta could add how the beta for the new game was available in select countries
 * https://forums.pokemontcg.com/topic/11770-build-notes-may-15th-2012/ used to source the re-release of the game as a unity engine game

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources