User:Amcappi/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Duke Nukem 3D

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I like Duke Nukem 3D and some information may be outdated or could be added after the release of Duke Nukem 3D: World Tour. Video games articles also most likely need more sources or to be fleshed out as they are not as important.

Evaluate the article
The lead section appears pretty solid, it introduces the game and why it's important as well as release dates. Maybe there could be more references but I don't think it's super necessary. The content all seems relevant and up to date, it includes all the stuff you would normally need to see in a video game article as well as all the different releases and expansion packs. I think the controversy section could be expanded on to incorporate some more instances or go more into depth on the portrayal of women as mentioned in the lead. The article doesn't appear to be biased in anyway, the article addresses the games controversy fairly and with a neutral stance. There are lots of sources and the links work, they are relevant to the sentences they are cited in. I am kind of surprised by how many they could fit into the article but most are from news sources as it is a video game, they span a good time period as well. The talk page is pretty causal with most of the post being late 2000s but some in the mid 2010s. It is apart of the videogames, comedy and science fiction wikiprojects.