User:Amcgeesa/Brain fag syndrome/Amckin23 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(amcgessa)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Amcgeesa/Brain_fag_syndrome?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Brain fag syndrome

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? - I think your lead needs more information. There isn't any information regarding what Brain Fag is.

Content


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? -Not much information to answer this question.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? - There are no references
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? - There isn't much content to answer this question.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? - Yes it does you are addressing how other cultures are underrepresented: Not enough information to answer this question.

Tone and Balance


 * Is the content added neutral? - There is not enough information.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?: There isn't enough information in the article.

Sources and References


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? - No there are no references. Here is a reference you might want to use. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4706136/


 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? /Is at least one of them a source from class reading or the "suggested sources" list? If not, can you think of anything we've read that might be useful for them? (*additional question from Professor Heinz*) No, there are no sources.
 * Are the sources current? -No
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?No, there are no sources.
 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.) - yes you can go on JSTOR to find articles about your subject.

Organization


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? No you need to add more sentences. However you are off to a great start.


 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? - No, needs to be more organized.
 * Overall impressions


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?/How can the content added be improved? - It's a little hard to tell right now. I think maybe an article on how brain fag affects adolescents and adults would be a great addition. I think more information about what causes brain fag, and how it can be treated would also help. You can also talk about the history of brain fag. Also, ways to tell that you have brain fag.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? It's hard to answer this currently. There is a lack of information.
 * Additional Questions


 * Does your peer have 5-7 reliable sources? No, they have no references.
 * Does the topic link in some way to our course material? Yes, it is a clinical construct used in modern west African psychiatry.
 * Does your peer add historical context to their article? No, but under sources and references I linked an example.
 * Based on what you know from course content, what do you think Wikipedia users should know about this topic? In other words, what would you recommend adding and/or considering further? (*see "overall impressions" for my suggestions on ways to improve your article and how to continue your strengths).

-Asya