User:Ameliadorsey59/sandbox

The evolutionary development of selective memory and retention is theorized to stem from the drive to belong (Gardner, Pickett, & Brewer, 2000). Social drive is considered to be an equivalent to other drives (i.e. hunger) in evolutionary terms (Gardner et al., 2000). This definition stems from the idea that people only retain socially relevant information and are constantly processing information that will increase the ability to be part of a group. If survival is dependent on the group through information shared between individuals, researchers found that the perception and retention of certain information increases (Gardner et al., 2000). When in a new situation or surrounded by a desired group of people, there may be a heightened attention to details and the environmental and social cues. Information that is relevant to situations is brought to the surface again through processes like semantic and episodic memory (Baddeley, Eysenck, & Anderson, 2009). These processes provide organization to the memories encoded and help the recall of pertinent properties and links (Baddeley et al., 2009). If an individual is in an ambiguous social situation, past stored information can arise through the linking of semantic information, or specific recall of socially relevant actions and aid survival.

Another application on the social advantage in selective memory is with reproduction. Testing female undergraduate students in recall found that in a short video with a male introducing themselves and being considered for a future partner, participants selectively remembered more of what he said than what he looked like (Seitz, Polack, & Miller, 2018). This is supporting of the notion that the purpose of evolution is to pass on genetic information and that selective retention plays a part in that. Seitz, Polack, and Miller (2018) also found that memory performance increased when stimulated by reproductive cues. In an evolutionary perspective, the organization of the semantic memory may link and connect this type of information more strongly to influence recall and therefore the survival of the individual.

While this process seems to have an evolutionary advantage, evidence suggests that when memories are selectively recalled other information is lost (Bäuml & Dobler, 2015). There can be danger in this because, while the forgotten information may not be pertinent in the current moment, it may be needed later. Researchers also found that during sleep emotional memories have higher retention than non-emotional or neutral memories (Payne & Kensinger, 2018). But this storage process does not occur only in sleep, but highly stressful situations also induce induce this selective type of memory consolidation (Payne & Kensinger, 2018). A benefit of this is that when a moment in time produces an intense emotional reaction, it is saved for better or for worse. But a consequence of emotional memories having priority is that pertinent neutral information may be lost in the aftermath of an emotional event. When thinking of the function of an item rather than the emotional concept of it, recall was higher (Seitz, Polack, & Miller, 2018). The use of an item may provide higher survival skills than just imagining the object and the emotions behind it.